He's only on the fence cos its the best place to watch all you merkins furiously jumping back and forth from one side to the other pretending to know what you are all on aboutOne of my best, responding to Gaz, the ultimate fence sitter.
Moeroa was one of the few who had a go in defence right from the start. But he was eventually gassed, along with every other merkin.
Lucky then we had a good defender in Mannah who went on in the first half to replace our tired middles ......
Paulo played 50 ish minutes straight and didn’t notice him return.
According to NRL.com he played one stint of 48 minutes: https://www.nrl.com/draw/nrl-premiership/2019/round-9/storm-v-eels/Paulo played 50 ish minutes straight and didn’t notice him return.
I provide plenty of opinions.One of my best, responding to Gaz, the ultimate fence sitter.
At a time when we are trying for consistency we go and experiment with something ridiculous against one of the best teams in the comp
Who the f&$k knows. At times we look like world beaters then we deliver this shit. Has a team ever started with their only hooker on the bench and put their fullback at hooker to compensate this? Ever? And that said fullback plays an integral part in the teams attack. So essentially we started the game with no fullback and no hooker. Lmao
Gutherson does his best work up the middle anyway so it was a fair tactic. The loss wasn't due to tactics, it was lack of effort.Who the f&$k knows. At times we look like world beaters then we deliver this shit. Has a team ever started with their only hooker on the bench and put their fullback at hooker to compensate this? Ever? And that said fullback plays an integral part in the teams attack. So essentially we started the game with no fullback and no hooker. Lmao
Gutherson does his best work up the middle anyway so it was a fair tactic. The loss wasn't due to tactics, it was lack of effort.
Gutherson does his best work up the middle anyway so it was a fair tactic. The loss wasn't due to tactics, it was lack of effort.
Having no ball for the first 30 minutes threw our rotation out of whack.The tactic also led to a shit rotation of our middle forwards. It threw everything out of whack
Having no ball for the first 30 minutes threw our rotation out of whack.
Gutherson does his best work up the middle anyway so it was a fair tactic. The loss wasn't due to tactics, it was lack of effort.
Crying and screaming at these inconsistent merkins is different. When Bellamy does it during every game he is called passionate but I’m a little boy?I provide plenty of opinions.
The difference is that mine are rational, whereas yours are emotional. You are grown man for f**ks sake. Have some respect for yourself and stop crying like a little boy when things don't go your way.
Due to the poor service of our dummy half you would have to think this played a part in us having no ball the first 30 mins???Having no ball for the first 30 minutes threw our rotation out of whack.
It's possible. But the lack of effort came after Mahoney came onto the field, including from Mahoney. We conceded two tries in the 20 minutes he was on the bench, and nine tries in the final 60.
Who the f&$k knows. At times we look like world beaters then we deliver this shit. Has a team ever started with their only hooker on the bench and put their fullback at hooker to compensate this? Ever? And that said fullback plays an integral part in the teams attack. So essentially we started the game with no fullback and no hooker. Lmao