The reason they sacked anderson was because we were told missing the semi's was unacceptable for this club so they brought in kearney.
So with a new coach we were meant to fix the incosistency from game to game under longface leader then after round 12 2011 it became a rebuilding year with a 3 year plan.
So after round 4 its a clean out year which has now become 5 year plan.
mmmmmmm surely the buck has to stop somewhere
1. The reason we were told that Anderson was sacked was that his future planning was not good enough.
2. 3 or 5 year plan, sacking Kearney now will not get any better results this year or next.
The buck HAS stopped.
We have a coaching and recruitment team who have come in and said recruitment, retention and attitude are all crap and we are rebuilding from the bottom up.
They have targeted areas and begun addressing them.
The players initially reacted well and have now dropped their bundle two games on a row.
All the good work will now be undone because of people with ore-existing agendas about Anderson/ 3p/ fitzgerald / or who don't want particular players omitted.
Sacking Kearney one season and four games in would be a disaster.
And people saying he has a great roster are being disingenuous.
He has a moderate roster with no hooker, an average back row, atrocious outside backs and no depth.
In addition his best player by a million miles has been unavailable.
There are soapy political fingers in and outside this club it has not been allowed to pull in one direction for twenty years - maybe more.