What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

The T.V Rights Thread Part III

How much will the Total Broadcast Rights Deal be?


  • Total voters
    213
Status
Not open for further replies.

Western_Eel

Juniors
Messages
1,395
I hope Fox Sports gets all games live if they are willing to pay for it.
If they share it with a free to air channel good if not i dont care, Fox have been the only ones thats given RL the respect it deserves.
 

Ray Mosters

Juniors
Messages
237
channel 10 is in a trading halt this morning, pretty sure they are announcing the details of their sale of EYE for 150m or so

on top of their capital raising from last month it leaves them with lots of liquidity and massively lowered debt.

looking better and better for a serious go at it
 

Ray Mosters

Juniors
Messages
237
Yeah, its was in the financial review this morning

Doesent look that likely though. TPG are just too far off in their valuation, such that CVC wouldnt even be able to pay off the debt and would have to swallow a massive loss.

It would be better for us if that happened, and soon, as TPG has massive amounts of cash it can draw on internationally, and if it got Nine for a bargain it would be more likely to funnel some offshore cash into value-adding, say by content acquisition ;-)

But as i say its unlikely, CVC are more likely to hold and try to trade their way out of it. nine is still the number 1 network in australia with multiple arms in a few other businesses too, and even if the debt for equity takeover does take place it will happen in a negotiated way, and CVC could still recoup something.

It all depends on how bleak CVC thinks the australian media market is. if it bails out $800M in the red for fear of losing alot more, then you know things are really f**ked.
 
Last edited:

Ray Mosters

Juniors
Messages
237
http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20120719-719953.html

MELBOURNE--Ten Network Holdings Ltd. (TEN.AU) said Friday it will sell its outdoor advertising business EYE Corp. to Champ Private Equity-controlled Outdoor Media Operations Pty. Ltd. in a deal valuing EYE at up to 145 million Australian dollars (US$151 million).

Ten, which is Australia's third highest rating television station, behind the Seven and Nine networks, said in a statement it would use the proceeds of the sale to pay down debt.

"It will make our balance sheet stronger by further reducing debt and will give us additional opportunity to invest in the creative renewal of Ten's television content," Chief Executive James Warburton said.

Ten also said it would help Outdoor Media Operations, which owns outdoor advertising specialist oOh!media, sell the U.S. and U.K. operations of EYE and could reacquire them if they were unable to be sold.

It said the final sale proceeds would be subject to the sale of the U.S. and U.K. operations.

There you go, debt paydown and content acquisition.

Bring it on, Channel 10
 
Last edited:

Cletus

First Grade
Messages
7,171
Yeah, its was in the financial review this morning

Doesent look that likely though. TPG are just too far off in their valuation, such that CVC wouldnt even be able to pay off the debt and would have to swallow a massive loss.

It would be better for us if that happened, and soon, as TPG has massive amounts of cash it can draw on internationally, and if it got Nine for a bargain it would be more likely to funnel some offshore cash into value-adding, say by content acquisition ;-)

But as i say its unlikely, CVC are more likely to hold and try to trade their way out of it. nine is still the number 1 network in australia with multiple arms in a few other businesses too, and even if the debt for equity takeover does take place it will happen in a negotiated way, and CVC could still recoup something.

It all depends on how bleak CVC thinks the australian media market is. if it bails out $800M in the red for fear of losing alot more, then you know things are really f**ked.

It sound like a pretty reasonable offer if you ask me. CVC can't expect someone to bail out their investment by paying overs for Nine and they won't be able to refinance the debt in six months time. They're only just covering the interest payments as it is so they won't trade out of it.
 

Ray Mosters

Juniors
Messages
237
It sound like a pretty reasonable offer if you ask me. CVC can't expect someone to bail out their investment by paying overs for Nine and they won't be able to refinance the debt in six months time. They're only just covering the interest payments as it is so they won't trade out of it.
They cant expect it, but they can hope for it :)

The option for CVC is always to reinvest and pay down debt with cash from other assets, if they think the value of Nine can be turned around eventually then they can do that, and Nine is still very profitable, its just debt-laden.

Capital raisings are in vogue lately, if CVC/Nine can fight their way into the new year past the debt maturation, acquire the NRL rights and some other decent stuff for a moderate sum, then they might try something like that to help pay off their debt. So there is options for them to keep fighting.

On the other hand, they are on the top of the heap with regard to ratings and stuff at the moment. And with the shrinking (1% growth is basically shrinking ;)) Australian FTA television market they might think that in terms of ratings and revenue there is a long way to go down, and if they cant get out of this debt trap now then there is definitely no way out later. Maybe they aught to just take the loss and GTFO while they are only 800m in the red.

The only thing im sure of is that im f**king glad that im not a shareholder.
 
Messages
3,138
NINE LOSING TV WAR
THE show isn't over yet, but Channel 9 is bracing itself for the possibility it will miss out on retaining the rugby league broadcast rights. The mood at the long-term rights-holders has been described to us as "pessimistic".
Over at Channel 10, though, they are feeling "supremely confident" about their chances of winning out.

http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sp...at-the-eels-need/story-e6frexnr-1226431195182

This is maybe the first time I have seen a journalist NOT blowing a load upon channel 9 chances on winning the rights. Most articles have it as a fait accompli Ch9 will win the rights.
 

hineyrulz

Post Whore
Messages
153,806
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sp...at-the-eels-need/story-e6frexnr-1226431195182

This is maybe the first time I have seen a journalist NOT blowing a load upon channel 9 chances on winning the rights. Most articles have it as a fait accompli Ch9 will win the rights.
jim_carrey_dance.gif
 

taipan

Referee
Messages
22,500
Hope that is the case.Ch10 can swap "the Shire "for the NRL
The crap that is the Shire reality Tv and ch9 deserve each other.

Channel 9 can then become " the home of pure and utter bilge ".

ch10>ch9

ch10 promotion of rugby league> ch9 promotion of rugby league

As BIg Kev used to say " Ï'm excited'
 

El Diablo

Post Whore
Messages
94,107
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/med...id-on-nrl-rights/story-e6frg996-1226431233691

Eye sale cashes up Ten for bid on NRL rights

by: Darren Davidson
From: The Australian
July 21, 2012 12:00AM

TEN Network has sold outdoor advertising business Eye to oOh!media in a deal worth possibly $145 million, putting the free-to-air network on a firmer financial footing as it bids for NRL broadcast rights.

The media company will receive $120m in cash from the outdoor advertising company's owner, Champ Private Equity, and a deferred consideration of $25m payable three years after completion.

The deal includes all of Eye's Australian and New Zealand businesses, as well as the US, British and Indonesian operations.

However, oOh!Media and Ten intend to on-sell the US and British operations to third parties.

Ten may be required to reacquire them from oOh!Media for a "nominal consideration" if the buyers fail to offload them in an agreed time, but both companies said there had been plenty of interest in the US and British assets.

"Based on our exploration of potential buyers, there has been good interest. We are confident we will find buyers for the US and British businesses," Champ Private Equity director Darren Smorgon said.

The deal had been done at a "fair price", and the company was not interested in retaining the US and British operations because it had a mandate to invest in Australia, he said.

"We want to back oOh!Media to grow in the Australasian market. We don't have a presence in the UK at all," Mr Smorgon said.

The deal depends on approval by the competition watchdog, but analysts do not expect the Australian Competition & Consumer Commission to block the sale, expected to be completed in eight to 12 weeks.

Mr Smorgon said there would be cost savings from merging the two outdoor advertising businesses, and did not rule out retrenchments.

"There are a number of opportunities to save costs, but there is a lot of work ahead to identify the most appropriate cost savings.

"We've formed an integration team to make those decisions."

Citi equities analyst Justin Diddams said the deferred cash payment structure of the deal was "frustrating", but ultimately represented a positive result for Ten.

"It's not a clean break, but it's a good deal for Ten, getting $120m of cash in the door in 2012-13, followed by the $25m in three years," Mr Diddams said.

The price was good, he said, as there were no other bidders after two interested parties dropped out in the early running.

APN Outdoor, a joint venture between Quadrant Private Equity and APN News & Media, and French company JC Decaux both ran the rule over Eye at one stage.

"Management have secured a fair price, given the onerous contracts and lack of bidders for the asset," Mr Diddams said.

"It's a smart move by management, with positive strategic and earnings implications."

Ten chief executive James Warburton said proceeds from the sale would be used to pay down debt and strengthen the balance sheet after last month's $200m capital raising, as a $US125m ($120m) debt facility matured in March.

"It will make our balance sheet stronger by further reducing debt and will give us additional opportunity to invest in the creative renewal of Ten's television content," Mr Warburton said.

Ten's group chief financial officer Paul Anderson said it had not decided how much of the proceeds would be invested in programming, but acknowledged the deal could boost its interest in the NRL sports rights.

"It gives us a lot more flexibility on the balance sheet to do a whole range of things," he said.

Mr Smorgon did not rule out further acquisitions in outdoor advertising, and said no decision had been taken on whether the Eye and oOh!media names would be retained.

"I think it's fair to say we won't be making acquisition relative to the size of oOh!Media or Eye, but we are opportunistic and will look at making other acquisitions . . . We're not looking to expand outside of the out-of-home space."
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Top