El Diablo
Post Whore
- Messages
- 94,107
![]()
He just looks like a fat Victorian Merkin.
makes me wanna puke
hope he gets hit by a f**king bus
![]()
He just looks like a fat Victorian Merkin.
So basically even if you ignore NZ we still smashed the AFL. We should be getting just as much as them.
“There will be a strong focus on getting a whole of game strategic plan in place,” he said.
“It is important that as we look towards a significant growth in revenue that there is a strategy that underpins the way that money is used.
“The Commission is a unique opportunity to review existing plans without the constraints of the game’s previous structure.”
The meeting today looked closely at marketing and new media strategies as well as a close analysis of Rugby League’s development figures.
Similar article in SMH today
That will have the inmates at "The Big FOODY Home for the Mentally Challenged" frothing at the mouth.Similar article in SMH today
League wins battle with AFL for TV viewers
http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/...-tv-viewers-20111129-1o58v.html#ixzz1f7kgYZDe
Victorian mentals will have their usual melt down, disregarding the RL figures with the same old arguments; because it was a full moon last week, Rep football doesn't count (because the AFL has none), SoO is a gimmic and doesn't count, NRL ratings are skewed because of the schedule, some sort of rant about regionals...:lol:That will have the inmates at "The Big FOODY Home for the Mentally Challenged" frothing at the mouth.
So basically even if you ignore NZ we still smashed the AFL. We should be getting just as much as them.
Rugby league has abunch of pocket-lining, seat warming nuffies who have a News Limited-appointed CEO (1) dealing with News Limited on TV rights and 92) talking the game down at every opportunity.
Yet - we crap on here about why we don't get the best deal. THEN, we have an Independent Commission which keeps the same News Limited bloke as CEO. fair dinkum.
But these figures are nothing new. TV has always had it over AFL as a TV sport.
the difference is that the AFL have professional, effective business people running their sport who have negotiated great TV rights outcomes for their game.
Rugby league has abunch of pocket-lining, seat warming nuffies who have a News Limited-appointed CEO (1) dealing with News Limited on TV rights and 92) talking the game down at every opportunity.
Yet - we crap on here about why we don't get the best deal. THEN, we have an Independent Commission which keeps the same News Limited bloke as CEO. fair dinkum.
That will have the inmates at "The Big FOODY Home for the Mentally Challenged" frothing at the mouth.
:lol:
Like clockwork they start harping on about Origin and Toyota Cup.
Regular NRL home and away season games have a higher per game viewing average across all combined Australian markets than their AFL counterpart.
That's even after considering that the NRL has less games on FTA and are screened at poor times in three of the metros.
It also doesn't include the New Zealand NRL numbers. What are the AFL's New Zealand ratings? They should know because they can count it with their hands.