ShanghaiCharlie
Juniors
- Messages
- 321
I'd prefer he came and you went.I think he is a homous for not signing already. f**k him. If he doesnt want to come, he can stay down there with his jet skis and harvey norman vouchers.
I'd prefer he came and you went.I think he is a homous for not signing already. f**k him. If he doesnt want to come, he can stay down there with his jet skis and harvey norman vouchers.
Bit of a waste at prop, tigers probably wouldn't be able to resist and throw him there because there backrow is pretty strong. Hope he goes to the Eels, all they have is Hindmarsh.
I'd prefer he came and you went.
we're denying it in the light of the salary cap we recently copped, and the fact we've not shed any players.
Heighno is too small & too predictive IMO, I am with you, in that I don't know Blair's game either, but your back 3 looks good, if he is as good as they all think?On the Tigers main site they are saying with McKinnon going and at least one of two (referring to Gibbs and Fulton) going, space is being created to fit Blair into the salary cap.
If he does come on board I would like to see him play lock. I know lock is similar to a third prop in positional play but I don't see value in playing Blair as a tradional prop. I think he is better running a little wide of the ruck or getting involved in second phase play...or running off Lui/Marshall in broken play.
Can he play a full 80 minutes? I can't say I have ever really taken that much notice. He is devastating running a little wide, but I would rather see BMM, Fifita, Galloway, Woods and Gibbs running in tight. Don't know what happens to Hino if he does play lock.
It isn't a bad back row of Dwyer, Ellis and Blair. The rotation of props with those young guns looks OK to me.
Just my thoughts.
Blair nearly always plays 80 minutes,and backrow is his spot.On the Tigers main site they are saying with McKinnon going and at least one of two (referring to Gibbs and Fulton) going, space is being created to fit Blair into the salary cap.
If he does come on board I would like to see him play lock. I know lock is similar to a third prop in positional play but I don't see value in playing Blair as a tradional prop. I think he is better running a little wide of the ruck or getting involved in second phase play...or running off Lui/Marshall in broken play.
Can he play a full 80 minutes? I can't say I have ever really taken that much notice. He is devastating running a little wide, but I would rather see BMM, Fifita, Galloway, Woods and Gibbs running in tight. Don't know what happens to Hino if he does play lock.
Blair nearly always plays 80 minutes,and backrow is his spot.
It isn't a bad back row of Dwyer, Ellis and Blair. The rotation of props with those young guns looks OK to me.
Just my thoughts.
Blair nearly always plays 80 minutes,and backrow is his spot.
Going by your scenario we will still have three squad spots to fill.....but no moneyhttp://www.theaustralian.com.au/new...ve-way-for-blair/story-e6frg7mf-1226068976573
So Wade and Payten will be off our cap next year - plus we have 100,000 cap rise...
Add Mark Flanagan and Geoff Daniella's $$ to that and we easily have Blair's Money - I still don't think he will be on the cap for $500k...we might be paying hm 500k but surely that will be the result of 3rd party contracts...
If Fulton and Gibbs go - Surely they will be replaced with some new blood- Hope Gibbs Stays though...
Going by your scenario we will still have three squad spots to fill.....but no money
Going by our injury history Im glad your no in charge of recruitment