What's new
By:
Advanced search…
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Tim Moltzen ... (war is over)

Father Ted

Father Ted

First Grade
Messages
5,531
andrew9148 said:
If they don't have contracts for 2012 what are they getting released from ? Their contracts would have ended by now
Click to expand...
we are yet to formally sign the “Deeds of Release” for Darius Boyd and Ratu Peni Tagive - Doust

Using the West Tigers business model that means they are both still Dragons.

Andrew you have this wonderful ability not to see the obvious even when it's laid out in front of you .
 
U

USDragon

Juniors
Messages
145
Boyd had signed an extension before the 2011 season started but then asked for a release when he decided he wanted to follow Bennett to Newcastle. This was well documented at the time of the announcement that he is leaving us.

Going by the Moltzen episode, we could still go back on our word and keep Boyd for next season which would be perfectly legal by the Tigers' standard.
 
Father Ted

Father Ted

First Grade
Messages
5,531
USDragon said:
Boyd had signed an extension before the 2011 season started but then asked for a release when he decided he wanted to follow Bennett to Newcastle. This was well documented at the time of the announcement that he is leaving us.

Going by the Moltzen episode, we could still go back on our word and keep Boyd for next season which would be perfectly legal by the Tigers' standard.
Click to expand...

And if the NRL rules in the Tigers favour maybe keeping Boyd should become an option. Just throwing it out there folks
 
Father Ted

Father Ted

First Grade
Messages
5,531
gypsy said:
That will never work. Boyd couldn't replace....Boyd :sarcasm:
Click to expand...

Think like a tiger my old son :crazy: Like Drain the Dragon said lets get Smith and Costigan back as well. If the NRL rules against us it's no more mister nice dragon
 
Last edited:
Stagger Lee

Stagger Lee

Bench
Messages
4,931
Just throwing out a few new questions - If Tigers are paying Tiny Tim more money to stay with them next season does that not constitute a new contract? if so does that means they have to cancel the one he already has with them? If so .... how can they because we have a contract with him?

thoughts?
 
R

Ritzley

Juniors
Messages
315
D

Daniel Dragons

Bench
Messages
4,407
Stagger Lee said:
Just throwing out a few new questions - If Tigers are paying Tiny Tim more money to stay with them next season does that not constitute a new contract? if so does that means they have to cancel the one he already has with them? If so .... how can they because we have a contract with him?

thoughts?
Click to expand...

It'd be a contract upgrade, not a cancellation/new contract.
 
T

TimmyB

Juniors
Messages
2,332
USDragon said:
Boyd had signed an extension before the 2011 season started but then asked for a release when he decided he wanted to follow Bennett to Newcastle. This was well documented at the time of the announcement that he is leaving us.

Going by the Moltzen episode, we could still go back on our word and keep Boyd for next season which would be perfectly legal by the Tigers' standard.
Click to expand...

Why do Dragons' supporters keep peddling this bullshit?

It was also well documented that Boyd's contract contained a clause allowing him to leave the club if Bennett were to leave the club. Moltzen has no clauses to leave the club that are relevant in this case. It's a pretty f**king crucial difference. If we refuse to sign a deed releasing Moltzen from his contract and he tries to play for the Dragons we have an actionable claim against Moltzen. Boyd doesn't need one; once Bennett leaves the contract is voidable.
 
SET2JT

SET2JT

Juniors
Messages
1,266
TimmyB said:
Why do Dragons' supporters keep peddling this bullshit?

It was also well documented that Boyd's contract contained a clause allowing him to leave the club if Bennett were to leave the club. Moltzen has no clauses to leave the club that are relevant in this case. It's a pretty f**king crucial difference. If we refuse to sign a deed releasing Moltzen from his contract and he tries to play for the Dragons we have an actionable claim against Moltzen. Boyd doesn't need one; once Bennett leaves the contract is voidable.
Click to expand...
What if Boyd now wants to Change his mind and stay with his friends at Saints? We haven't signed his release so we could still keep him. Imagine how the knights would feel!
 
Father Ted

Father Ted

First Grade
Messages
5,531
TimmyB said:
Why do Dragons' supporters keep peddling this bullshit?

It was also well documented that Boyd's contract contained a clause allowing him to leave the club if Bennett were to leave the club. Moltzen has no clauses to leave the club that are relevant in this case. It's a pretty f**king crucial difference. If we refuse to sign a deed releasing Moltzen from his contract and he tries to play for the Dragons we have an actionable claim against Moltzen. Boyd doesn't need one; once Bennett leaves the contract is voidable.
Click to expand...

You don't have a clue what Boyds contract actually says so whos full of shit? If the well documented source is News Ltd then my response is Bahahahahahahahaha.
 
Divine

Divine

Bench
Messages
3,075
Legalese aside when the f... is this thing going to be resolved?

30d7xie.jpg
 
Father Ted

Father Ted

First Grade
Messages
5,531
Ritzley said:
As well all know "verbal contracts aren't worth the paper they're written on"...
Click to expand...

Verbal agreements aren't worth the paper there NOT written on lol.
We find out this week what there worth . I want a Dragons victory not because I want the little so in so but because I like Dragons Victories. And ruling against us may open Pandoras box in a lot of clubs.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Top