What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Tinkler proposal back on (take 3)

Serc

First Grade
Messages
6,902
Ex-players first on list for Tinkler's sales pitch
BY JAMES GARDINER
10 Mar, 2011 01:00 AM

MINING magnate and would-be Knights owner Nathan Tinkler loves talking footy, and tonight he will have the perfect audience.
Tinkler will meet with the Once-A-Knight Old Boys Club to outline his proposal to privatise the club and the plans to make it an NRL powerhouse.
The session with the old boys is one of several Tinkler will host before his bid to buy the Knights is put to a members' vote at a meeting on March 31.
"It is an opportunity for the ex-players to meet Nathan face to face," said Tinkler Sport Group executive chairman Ken Edwards, who will also address the club members.
"It is appropriate that the Knights Old Boys, having contributed so much to the club, is the first group to sit down with Nathan and have him clearly outline the proposal and its benefits for members."
Several former players, headed by premiership-winning captain Paul Harragon, have been enlisted as ambassadors for the Tinkler proposal and will appear in a series of advertisements to be aired over the next three weeks.
"We have been overwhelmed with the support from the old boys," Edwards said.
"Michael Hagan, Paul Harragon, Mark Sargent, Tony Butterfield and Mal Reilly are just some of the former players and coaches who have contacted TSG to offer their support publicly.
"The most important aspect of tomorrow night and the future public meetings is that TSG has the opportunity to present the proposal and offer clarity to members before they vote.
"As Nathan has stated, he is passionate about the Knights and his offer is fair dinkum. He simply wants all members to understand all the benefits that will come from the offer."
Tinkler needs at least 75 per cent of up to 3000 members to vote in favour of his takeover at the meeting.
Backed by a $20 million bank guarantee for the first two years of the deal, and a $10 million guarantee for the following eight years, Tinkler's offer guarantees $10 million in annual sponsorship revenue for the next 10 years.
Maintaining the Knights as a not-for-profit entity and protecting the club's name, colours, location and home ground in a "heritage share", the deal includes clearing their accumulated losses by up to $3.5 million, injecting $2.5 million a year into junior development and guaranteeing members' buy-back rights in the unlikely event of Tinkler becoming insolvent.
http://www.theherald.com.au/news/lo...on-list-for-tinklers-sales-pitch/2098935.aspx
 

Serc

First Grade
Messages
6,902
At the end of tonight's footy coverage up they were going through the Sunday footy programs - including mentioning that Burro will be on the Sunday Footy Show to talk about the Tinkler offer.
 

Alex28

Coach
Messages
11,929
The overuse of "Vote YES for Success" on the website makes me cringe a little bit...

The guy really is going all out to make sure this gets across the line. It is an exciting time!
 

PoWdErFiNgEr84

Juniors
Messages
68
you can promise the world and deliver a pile of sh*t. Once things are set in concret within the protection of the law our club will be able to celebrate the exciting times that are to come.
 

Pedge1971

First Grade
Messages
5,898
Truth be told, Burro shouldn't really be offering opinions on the various models as it's not his call. The directors are the ones with the legal obligation to give full disclosure to the members. Burro could be construed as having potential conflict of interest by promoting one model over the other. Not suggesting that's the case but he really should stay out of public discussion.

100% right. Burraston should stay away from it. It doesn't make him look good by giving any opinion.
 

Pedge1971

First Grade
Messages
5,898
Pro's & Cons. What do we get if we vote status quo. Yes a gamble, but I'm sick of following a dead horse.......
 
Messages
3,813
I think the club run the risk of people leaving in droves if it does not go through especially if it is democratically a YES vote in favour. Speaking to lots of people they are sick to their bones about being in the poor house and being laughed at. This is our chance to stick it up the people who have looked down upon us for years. If people cannot see that and are satisfied with being also rans for decades to come then they should f### off and follow AFL.
 

aqua_duck

Coach
Messages
18,509
If the members knew the limitations our team had to work with (as pointed out by Pika) then they'd be silly to vote no. I think someone at the herald should do a write up comparing our resources to a team like Melbourne or the Titans, just to illustrate the difference abit of extra cash can make. If they knew the truth and still voted no then they're just morons
 

Rusty

Juniors
Messages
1,676
Steve Burraston will on Foxsports2 at the conclusion of Dogs V Tigers game to talk about the Tinkler privatisation offer.
 

Rusty

Juniors
Messages
1,676
He just spoke about the offer. Burraston stated that the Knights weren't interested in Bennett and they had not held talks with him and that they were happy with Rick Stone.
 
Messages
2,862
And he did not give his own opinion, just said what he should say.................................after all it IS A MEMBERS VOTE............which he pointed out on air.
 
Messages
16,034
Wonder if its still on the table as all he mentioned was that we are break even club and that we'd continue on fine without Tink's?

Found it very curious, aside from that nothing new that we haven't heard before.
 

Peppers

Juniors
Messages
258
He was on for about 5 mins and didn't say much at all which I guess you can expect. If he has a preference for which way the vote goes, he sure as hell didn't give it away last night.
 

Alex28

Coach
Messages
11,929
Baron - I read that to suggest that if the Tinkler vote doesn't get across the line the club will be able to trade. Sections tend to think the club is dead in the water without his money which isn't true.
 
Top