Newie is God's Country
Bench
- Messages
- 3,813
PriceWaterhouseCoopers has full control over the voting process and count.
R they the mob who audited the storm over the cap scandal?
PriceWaterhouseCoopers has full control over the voting process and count.
That's interesting in itself as email correspondence I had from the Knights Office stated that voting information had only been sent to those members eligible to vote.
Proxy forms were available at tables AFTER the meeting Cram........................hence my concern.
Every proxy vote requires the membership number on the form. I have no doubt that PWC will have been provided with a list of all Knights members eligible to vote and would therefore be able to remove those proxy forms from those not eligible to vote.
*their ;-)That apparently is correct Fred, after having contacted Knights office I was assured that ALL proxies coming in had there membership number checked against Knights members database by PWC. If there was no membership number, or filled in incorrectly, then they were counted as informal votes.
:lol: Harsh.
Although technically i still am. In any case, did anything worthwhile happen at the meeting last night? Did any new information come to light?
ok.. so what if there is a valid membership number, but the member didn't renew before November 30, which i believe was the case in the example you gave? i assume this database only holds voting members in this case?That apparently is correct Fred, after having contacted Knights office I was assured that ALL proxies coming in had there membership number checked against Knights members database by PWC. If there was no membership number, or filled in incorrectly, then they were counted as informal votes.
ok.. so what if there is a valid membership number, but the member didn't renew before November 30, which i believe was the case in the example you gave? i assume this database only holds voting members in this case?[/QUOTE]
Thats what i am hoping Pervey, otherwise anyone who is a member can vote...................which COULD swing it well and truly one way or the other.
ok.. so what if there is a valid membership number, but the member didn't renew before November 30, which i believe was the case in the example you gave? i assume this database only holds voting members in this case?
Good to see and ad in the paper featuring some of the Knights Nanas supporting the Tinkler Proposal.
can you scan and post mate?
can you scan and post mate?