Of course it is. Thats a statement of history, but it doesnt mean this was the BEST option. A lot of people would argue that this was a f*ck up...
The Broncos, Knights, Raiders, Steelers/Dragons, Cowboys, Warriors have all proven that new teams can be very successful and popular in old markets. The common theme is simply that these "United" teams were about the area being promoted to a higher level.
If, in 1988, the QRL/NSWRL had come together to form an ARL, they could have promoted a few of the best Sydney clubs plus formed a new club or two for the people whose teams weren't promoted.
Instead, we have a comp that (as you point out) has its origins solely in the NSWRL and were are still suffering from that today...
Amazingly innept grasp of cultural reality! Do you realise that all the Sydney clubs have immense external support outside of Sydney. I know for a fact that Newcastle were waiting decades to enter the Sydney competition due to such support. You have not factored in that the mass tv appeal of the code thru the Sydney competition is the fundamental basis for the NRL having credibility and mass popularity . You rid the NRL of clubs like North Sydney and you rid a whole locality of fans (plus external located fans)and a business sector as has been witnessed. The Bears are just one current example. Wonder how many fans have been lost due to the mergers!
Last edited: