AusKnightRKO
First Grade
- Messages
- 7,403
Good time to do it reset the defence... slow the game up
.
before the pats got caught cheating - won 3 superbowls
after the pats got caught cheating - won f**k all and will continue to win f**k all until he retires.
it's not so easy when he doesn't know what's coming.
.
Tough day for you Kurt.
Maybe this video will cheer you up.
I think BB is responsible for Brady's success, he probably knows this too.Yeah it's over now, even his most harsh critics must accept this now. I accepted it with his 4th but now he's got 5, and just engineered the greatest comeback in SB history, it's a wrap
He and BB are the respective GOAT's
Which stinks haha
I think BB is responsible for Brady's success, he probably knows this too.
The fact that all the backup QBs (recent ones included) and coaching staff looked bananas at the Pats but then ordinary elsewhere indicates this.
I think BB is responsible for Brady's success, he probably knows this too.
The fact that all the backup QBs (recent ones included) and coaching staff looked bananas at the Pats but then ordinary elsewhere indicates this.
You do realise that Bill Belichick was 41-57 with 0 Super Bowls and 1 playoff appearance before he started Tom Brady...
He's since gone 199-71 including 25-9 in the playoffs with 5 Super Bowl titles since he first started Tom Brady...
Yeah.... that CLEARLY shows Belichick was winning jackshit before Brady fell in his lap...
And all I know is Brady has been winning like a motherf**ker since he started in this league... and that's a fact...
Lmfao... that's such a geniused argument...If you think Spygate is no big deal then you have to call the NE defence that won the first 3 Superbowl's, one of the GOAT. Brady had 2 maybe 3 rings on his fingers before he was truly elite. That defense was wiping the floor with Manning, a top 5 all time QB himself, during those 3 Superbowl years before Manning fought back (3-1 vs Brady in AFCCG's #justsaying).
Lmfao... that's such a geniused argument...
So basically what your saying is that we should discount his first 2 maybe 3 rings because he had a GOAT defence on the other side??
So if we use that geniused logic then we should discount Payton's last 2 seasons with the Broncos where he relied on a GOAT defence....
You wanna say that Tom Brady wasn't truly elite with 2 maybe 3 of those rings?? Yet he was MVP in 2 of those 3 Super Bowls.
Remind me what Peyton was in the last 2 seasons?? An absolute passenger... he probably produced the worst performance by a Super Bowl winning QB in NFL history.
Say what you like about Brady in those early Super Bowl years... he still contributed greatly to those Super Bowls...
The Broncos won a Super Bowl in spite of having Peyton Manning at QB... that's something you have NEVER had to say about Brady.
Ohhh... and Tom Brady is 11-6 vs Peyton Manning overall... #getthef**kouttahereson
Never said they should be discounted. Just saying that BB is that good and is not only good because of Brady. NE had the #1 defence this year despite shipping off a bunch of talent as has been well documented. They also went 3-1 without Brady and 11-5 with Matt Cassell as QB. BB = GOAT coach. I am happy to finally say Brady is probably the GOAT but without BB there is a good chance he is Rich Gannon.
Lmfao... Manning didn't beat Brady... Von Miller and his crew on defence did... Brady was MILES better than Manning in that AFC Championship game... even with the pressure that all time great defence put on him he still threw for almost double what Manning threw for in that game...As for the attack on Peyton - he was still good enough, in his wheelchair, to beat Brady in the AFCCG with an OL that went on to put up the worst statistical blocking performance in SB history a game later. Manning was sharp vs NE in the first half (he basically booked Collins ticket to Cleveland that day) and had no protection in the second. Yes, Denver's defence was one of the best ever and they had maybe 2-3% drop off this season but what do you know - they missed the playoffs in an AFC that was weaker than a year before. I wonder why that is? Plenty of reports in Denver said they were lacking in leadership. Over his career, we know Manning has led poorly constructed teams to the playoffs with 4 SB appearances under 4 coaches. Manning has 10 wins in the playoffs with defences ranked 19 or worse. Brady, Montana and a laundry list of other QB's have 0.
So what if Brady is 11-6 vs Manning? I'd rather have a 3-1 record in the AFC version of the Superbowl - you know the highest stakes game these two could possibly ever play with all the pressure on. Sure, if not for the Manning's, Brady probably has 8 or 9 rings by now. But if you put Marino, Rodgers or Manning with BB starting in 2001, then they all have 10 rings.