Which would be valid if Tomkins was a god amongst insects at the Warriors.
But here he's barely running in the top five players in the club, and is a mile behind the leading fullbacks in the comp. I'm not sure exactly what his complaint was but if it was along the lines of having to "play below himself" at the Warriors then its completely invalid.
I doubt the rumors have any validity. It smacks of celebrity gossip.
Tomkins stats place him at top five in the NRL at Fb.
I realize that is hard to swallow but those are the stats posted on the other site.
It turns out that apart from some adjustment issues and some clangers that speak of a player not being up to it.....I go back to Sam Burgess a like for Like comparison.....poor starter in the NRL.....turns out he is the best forward in the comp now he's settled.
As such i would say it is prudent to wait.
The Warriors are a bottom feeder in the NRL in terms of position on the table.
That is fact and an impediment for any player coming from an uber structured system.
This does not excuse Sams clangers.....rather provides context.
Class is permanent form is fleeting.