Foran, Stewart and DCE were selected for the 4 nations for their respective countries (Foran is a permanent half in the NZ squad and Stewart was the incumbent Australian FB before his knee injury in 2009). I'd suggest they're all well above "decent".
Don't be fooled - these are players that are made to look better by being surrounded by quality teammates.
Also, Four Nations is an exhibition tournament - whoever Australia picks is going to win because the opposition usually have too many weaknesses. Look how bad the Kiwis were with their first choice centres out. Australia could field their 5th and 6th best centres and still be strong out wide.
Stewart excels in the area where he is strong (support play) but is very one-dimensional. He's like a poor man's Billy Slater.
As was suggested by a poll run on here late last year, Melbourne and Manly were clearly in front of everyone else as far as the quality of their spines.
A poll run on here? Please. Most peole on LU have no idea.
Melbourne definitely have a grat spine, as proven by how three of them were in the top 5 for Dally M voting last year - Melbourne's spine players look good
despite the lack of talent around them. Just like Jarryd Hayne (and Jonathan Thurston prior to last year).
Manly's spine players have a much easier job with all that talent around them. Of course, Cherry-Evans and Foran are still quite young (though both older than Hayne was when he won the Dally M Medal) and will continue to improve. Brett Stewart is on the decline.
Melbourne, Newcastle, North Queensland, Roosters and Wests all have better spines than Manly. None of them are as strong across the board though.