hineyrulz
Post Whore
- Messages
- 153,708
*TurdBig year for Stone. He could sink like a
*TurdBig year for Stone. He could sink like a
Moses was dangerous.
Gutherson was busy, and looked very fit.
Michael Jennings looked sharp.
Mahoney defended very well, and towards the end of the game, started kicking out of dummy half, and quite well, too.
Our best forwards, imo, were Paulo, Alvaro, and Kaufusi - but nobody was bad.
Several players made silly errors, but I thought our pack matched theirs.
I don't rate him either. I get that you can't have a team full of superstars, but I'm not even convinced he is a solid back-up player.No, he’s too small for first grade and had F/A skill.
stay on the fence if you like but he’s not a first graders arsehole. He’s a poor mans Brendan Oake.
Yeah but he could also float to the top. Like aBig year for Stone. He could sink like a
*Turd
I don't rate him either. I get that you can't have a team full of superstars, but I'm not even convinced he is a solid back-up player.
He's a bit like you trying to pick up at Chardon's. Tries hard, but not very effective.
I think that last sentence is the most accurate thing you have ever posted in here.I don't rate him either. I get that you can't have a team full of superstars, but I'm not even convinced he is a solid back-up player.
He's a bit like you trying to pick up at Chardon's. Tries hard, but not very effective.
Coaches often don't have the luxury of giving underperforming fringe first graders 30-40 games to prove themselves.He has played 7 games off the bench and a total of 130 odd minutes or the equivalent of one and a half Nrl games.
I am unsure how anyone could form an opinion based on this.
Also players need in the forwards especially around 30-40 games with quality minutes just to get up to speed.
Stones game time equates to about 3.
Sure he might be a dud but it is impossible to base it on his NRL career so far. Best to base on NSW cup form where he has been excellent.
Coaches often don't have the luxury of giving underperforming fringe first graders 30-40 games to prove themselves.
However, I can't fault his effort and for that reason I reckon BA will perservere for a little while longer. If I was BA though I'd piss him off.
I agree with the fact he slips off tackles a little to easy. And with limited game time and chances he is just to eager.
I would like to see Stone given a full game and see how handles it.
Coaches often don't have the luxury of giving underperforming fringe first graders 30-40 games to prove themselves.
However, I can't fault his effort and for that reason I reckon BA will perservere for a little while longer. If I was BA though I'd piss him off.
Yes but what about in the Panthers side
So we give a guy a full game just to see if he can handle it while we have 6 or 7 better options????
And from dummy half Stone makes Kenny Edwards looks like Cameron Smith.
They did a lot of dump and run because we weren’t committing players to tackles so Korisau looked sharp running but other then that he didn’t do much (got the 3 Dally M points from Ruan). And Cleary looked ok ball in hand but they were as disjointed as we were, which would indicate lack of organisation.Tbh, I didn't notice.
Korisau was sharp.
Tamou was strong.
Other than that, I have no idea.
Coaches often don't have the luxury of giving underperforming fringe first graders 30-40 games to prove themselves.
However, I can't fault his effort and for that reason I reckon BA will perservere for a little while longer. If I was BA though I'd piss him off.
Well Stone is a middle forward sooooooooooo Paulo,RCG,Nrown,Evans,Alvaro,Kaufusi,Stefano,Gower and Nuikore proved last year he can be effective in the middle. And i have no idea who he is but i'd even have Davey ahead of him.Name 6 or 7 better options.
Thanks