Trial vs. Sharks

[Karmawave]

One things for sure, its added some spice.

 

[keeney]

You also need to chill with the whole self importance thing. You don't have all the answers and acting like you do while disregarding everybody else's opinion is gonna make you nothing but unpopular. Just cos you're on a board of okies don't think you can conceal your condescension with the "I'm here for open debate" line, you're as prohibitive of that as anyone else.

 

[Karmawave]

As I have already said Keeney - Im unpopular from day one because certain people incorrectly believed I was someone I was not.

I'm chilled out here.

 

[perverse]

See above...

What's the point in naming names in here when people are convinced you're someone you arent? :lol:

Anyway, I welcome active debate, but the personal agendas that seem to arise in here - namely when I have given across insight into the feelings of Smith towards certain players - is just a bit too obvious and I'm unsure how open minded debate can ever truly happen on here ( with me at least )

i'm unsure of what you're talking about. i've got absolutely no idea who you are. to me you're a faceless dude on a forum that claims he has inside info from the club - something we've seen oh so many times before, and it's rarely - if ever - accurate.

once again, if you want instant credibility, you have to give us a reason. otherwise you just come across like loony #18401 that claims they are tight in the club and have information. the only other way you're going to gain credibility here is over time - by showing that your information is reliable and being correct when you go out on a limb. sh*tbagging other peoples thoughts because you "know" they are wrong is not going to get you anywhere fast - unless we know how you know.

 

[Pika]

Its all good with me karma, you are entitled to your opinion mate, and I respect that.

I think a lot of people around here rate Scott, and you going against the trend might ruffle a few feathers, but thats cool.

Walsh was declared fit to play two weeks before the Warriors game. He was running four weeks before that and did contact at three.

Sure he had a disrupted preseason, I never said he didnt, all I said was he was fit to play Warriors match. Scott played that game and Walshy was at Central Knights.

 

[The Camden Leisure Pirate]

Walsh was declared fit to play two weeks before the Warriors game. He was running four weeks before that and did contact at three.

Sure he had a disrupted preseason, I never said he didnt, all I said was he was fit to play Warriors match. Scott played that game and Walshy was at Central Knights.

See, now that is what real insider info looks like.

Once again Pika has come up with the goods.

 

[macavity]

See, now that is what real insider info looks like.

Once again Pika has come up with the goods.

dont give him a fat head dude....

 

[perverse]

See, now that is what real insider info looks like.

Once again Pika has come up with the goods.

indeed. thanks pika.

 

[perverse]

dont give him a fat head dude....

he already has one... or so i've heard.

which head are we talking about?

 

[The Camden Leisure Pirate]

dont give him a fat head dude....

I don't want Pika to get a fat anything around me....

 

[Karmawave]

See, now that is what real insider info looks like.

Once again Pika has come up with the goods.

:lol: Its no different to what I said. I never said Walsh was not fit to play - I said he had a disrupted pre season and is not where the Knights want him to be at fitness or strength wise - and Pika agreed.

He is BEHIND in schedule.

Fair dinkum , you blokes look for whatever you want to see.

Wow Pika, can you show me how to make my sh*t not stink too? ;-)

 

[Gene Krupa]

:bdh:

 

[Pika]

Haha, my head is in proportion to my body..... so I guess its fat.

Chin up Karma, forums are not popularity contests.

 

[perverse]

Chin up Karma, forums are not popularity contests.

they're NOT? :shock:

 

[antonius]

:BDH:

Lol gotta laugh at this

 

[antonius]

If Dureau plays first grade in the first 4 weeks for any reason other than injury, then of course I'll be wrong.


I'll be the first to admit I am if Dureau plays more first grade this year than any other combination.

I'm still wanting to know which option you're betting on, or is it both?

 

[~knights~]

:lol: Its no different to what I said. I never said Walsh was not fit to play - I said he had a disrupted pre season and is not where the Knights want him to be at fitness or strength wise - and Pika agreed.

He is BEHIND in schedule.

Fair dinkum , you blokes look for whatever you want to see.

Wow Pika, can you show me how to make my sh*t not stink too? ;-)

fair dinkum

you are so annoying

:crazy:

 

[Karmawave]

fair dinkum

you are so annoying

:crazy:

Only because I don't say what you want to hear ;-)

 

[Karmawave]

I'm still wanting to know which option you're betting on, or is it both?

What I mean Dear Antonius, is if the players are fully fit, and injuries play no part in decisions, then it is my belief that Dureau will play less games of first grade football this year than Bailey, Mullen or Walsh - as individuals.

Sorry for the confusion ;-)

 

[perverse]

What I mean Dear Antonius, is if the players are fully fit, and injuries play no part in decisions, then it is my belief that Dureau will play less games of first grade football this year than Bailey, Mullen or Walsh - as individuals.

Sorry for the confusion ;-)

completely moot point tbh.. when was the last time we had an injury free year in the halves?

injury is almost certain to play a part in almost every position on the field... and by saying this you've virtually guarenteed that if and when dureau does get a run in first grade then you'll be able to wheel out this line.

well done.