What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

TV deals to reward wealthiest footy clubs

El Diablo

Post Whore
Messages
94,107
http://www.smh.com.au/sport/tv-deals-to-reward-wealthiest-footy-clubs-20100828-13wtr.html

TV deals to reward wealthiest footy clubs
Daniel Ramus
August 29, 2010

A LIKELY $2 billion from the next AFL and NRL television rights deals is set to deliver an unprecedented boost to the brand value of the top clubs from the two codes, The Sun-Herald has found.

A list of the 10 most valuable football clubs in Australia across Australian rules, rugby league, rugby union and football, compiled by entertainment and trademark lawyer Wayne Covell of worthyofthename.com, highlights the critical role of television exposure in adding value to a club's brand.

For example, Covell's list attributes a value of $263million to Collingwood with $87.9million of that due to television revenue and audience projections.

In the NRL, television revenue and audience figures are also vital. Of the $169million value applied to Brisbane Broncos, $89.2million can be attributed to television weightings. For the Parramatta Eels, television revenue accounted for $86million of the club's value of $141million.

Interestingly, on a table compiled by brand analysis specialist Repucom International, highlighting the cumulative television audience of all football clubs in Australia across the four codes for 2009 on free-to-air television and Fox Sports, the Broncos are No.1, the Eels are No.2, and Collingwood are No.3.

The AFL's television deal, which expires at the end of next year, is worth $780million while the NRL's television deal, expiring at the end of the 2012 season, is worth $500million. Both codes will be looking for $1billion from their next deals.

Covell emphasises the central role television plays in his valuations.

"The size of the television deal has a huge impact on the football team valuations," he says.

"A large slice of the television fees paid are attributable to a team's viewership. Their audience drives sponsorship, advertising and merchandise deals."

With the NRL's potential to double the value of their current television deal, and the AFL set to increase its deal by $220million, it's interesting to compare their numbers to the English Premier League - its television deal is worth about $5billion, confirming its stature as the biggest football league in the world.

NRL chief executive David Gallop says he does not have a target price in mind for his code's next television deal, but feels the game has put forward a strong case to potential broadcasters.

Gallop told The Sun-Herald: "Our expectation is to get an increase in TV revenue that reflects the game's standing. We have not set a dollar value on that but we believe we have compelling content for any broadcasters and our ratings consistently reflect that."

He said the NRL was doing everything in its power to secure the best deal. "It is an enormous opportunity,'' Gallop said. ''It is unquestionably our biggest single revenue source so it plays an important role in growing the financial strength of the game and in helping the game reach as many people as possible. I don't think anyone is underestimating the significance of the next broadcasting deal."

AFL chief executive Andrew Demetriou says his code isn't in a battle for the same television money as the NRL, despite having signed NRL players Karmichael Hunt and Israel Folau.

"We do not believe we are competing for the same television dollar in our next round of TV rights negotiations," Demetriou says.

Covell's list comes after the release last month of Forbes magazine's valuation of the world's top 10 sporting franchises.

Manchester United topped the Forbes list, with a valuation of $2billion.

The total value of Australia's top 10 football brands is $1.8billion, which is about the value of the New York Yankees baseball team, which Forbes ranked as the world's third most valuable sports team.

Calculating the value


1. The top 10 list is based upon six key indicators - television rights, sponsorship, merchandise, hospitality, membership and ticket revenue projections for the next five years.

2. Four football competitions were considered: AFL, NRL, Super Rugby and the A-League.

3. The figures do not take into account revenue from gaming or poker machines, or club operating expenditure.

4. Each valuation is based upon the value of the sports team to the trademark owners (AFL or NRL) and the franchisee (the club).

5. AFL and NRL TV deals will be renegotiated in 2011 and 2012. Each is reported to be worth $1billion or more over five years.

6. The clubs' proportionate share of TV deals is based on Television Audience Comparison figures provided by Repucom International.
 

El Diablo

Post Whore
Messages
94,107
In the NRL, television revenue and audience figures are also vital. Of the $169million value applied to Brisbane Broncos, $89.2million can be attributed to television weightings. For the Parramatta Eels, television revenue accounted for $86million of the club's value of $141million.

Interestingly, on a table compiled by brand analysis specialist Repucom International, highlighting the cumulative television audience of all football clubs in Australia across the four codes for 2009 on free-to-air television and Fox Sports, the Broncos are No.1, the Eels are No.2, and Collingwood are No.3.

sh*t that's a lot of money

so why aren't we making a mint :?
 

Gronk

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
78,085
With figures like that being bandied about, we need people in charge who know how to build a brand and not be influenced by personal agendas.
 

boxhead

First Grade
Messages
5,958
Wow. We are the second most televised football club across Australia? That's pretty darn impressive.
Still, says something about our management....
 

fanaticeel

Juniors
Messages
916
Broncos are only no.1 because they would get the most free to air games of any club.

And the broncos have no competition in Brisbane for either supporters or corporate sponsors.

We are doing pretty well considering. I would have thought the St George brand would be higher though.
 

belmoreeel

Juniors
Messages
475
With figures like that being bandied about, we need people in charge who know how to build a brand and not be influenced by personal agendas.
in other words profesional marketing and business people not ex footballers that have money and inflated egos, Ray price said it on the matty johns show "these days it's a business"
 

Snoochies

First Grade
Messages
5,634
Collingwood are the number one most watched team yet they compete with alot of clubs who are local. Saying the Broncos are only popular because they are a one city team should mean that the Swans should be popular and also the Lions. Parramatta is proof you can be popular whilst competing with other local clubs.
 

strider

Post Whore
Messages
79,059
Collingwood are the number one most watched team yet they compete with alot of clubs who are local. Saying the Broncos are only popular because they are a one city team should mean that the Swans should be popular and also the Lions. Parramatta is proof you can be popular whilst competing with other local clubs.

not really - Brisbane are a one city team in a city where league is the dominant sport .... aussie rules is FAR from dominant in sydney or brisbane - so can't really make that comparison ..... maybe west coast eagles in perth might be a better comparison??? - don't know how well they do .... i think the main point about the Broncos tho is that they get a Friday free to air game almost every 2nd week - helps a bit
 

TheParraboy

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
69,273
gee the stats looks good for us

hope the brand doesnt decline when we start winning comps :sarcasm:
 

eels bloke

Juniors
Messages
339
Collingwood are the number one most watched team yet they compete with alot of clubs who are local. Saying the Broncos are only popular because they are a one city team should mean that the Swans should be popular and also the Lions. Parramatta is proof you can be popular whilst competing with other local clubs.

I interpreted it as Brisbane are the number one most watched, followed by the Eels and then Collingwood.

Collingwood are the most valuable but don't necessarily pull in the biggest television audiences as Brisbane and Parra do.

I would guess that they make a stack more than we do with their enormous membership numbers.
 

Twizzle

Administrator
Staff member
Messages
154,082
I would have thought Collingwood would be No 1. That's huge for us to be put above them, their support base is enormous.
 

Gronk

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
78,085
I would have thought Collingwood would be No 1. That's huge for us to be put above them, their support base is enormous.

Clearly we have an untapped market. C'wood have no reliance on the pokies yet I bet their turnover puts us to shame. We need a admin team who have the skill set to exploit this opportunity.
 

PJ Marshal

Coach
Messages
13,525
And the broncos have no competition in Brisbane for either supporters or corporate sponsors.

We are doing pretty well considering. I would have thought the St George brand would be higher though.


they are boring as bat sh*t to watch, its like watching a game of union when they play.

still they probably would be in the top 5

people probably also enjoy watching our games to see if we lose i have no doubt, same goes broncos. Infact Broncos, Eels and Collingwood plenty of people hate the clubs lol
 
Messages
15,760
Clearly we have an untapped market. C'wood have no reliance on the pokies yet I bet their turnover puts us to shame. We need a admin team who have the skill set to exploit this opportunity.

They have 58,000 members, Hawthorn have 53,000, Parramatta a Chandy over 11,000. (Hawthorn had more than this in 1996 when the clubs started to Push membership heavily).
 

TheRam

Coach
Messages
13,911
Since the mid 70's Parra has been the No1 rating team(till the Broncos) in the league when they go well with St George and South Sydney next depending on their success on the ladder. Day light is next. That is why I have on numerous occasions said that our management under Fitzy has squandered that opportunity/advantage massively.

Now we have new management and I still don't see much change, even though it is still early days. That said we need real big end of town business types on our board. Isn't there even just one of these types available and willing to jump on board? So far not even a murmur from anywhere or anyone.

I just don't get it. Essentially the number one club in the league and we have middle of the road leaders to guide us. Shakes head.
 
Top