Those same people are still in his corner. Still don't think he has done anything wrong
Which is where the issue lies. If he says he didn't mean it as some have taken it, Ivan backs his version.
Those on the board believe their version or those on the fence. Take Ivan and May word for it and come up with other sanctions.
One of the issues here is that we have been coloured by a very negative media reporting of the story. Whether that is anti-negative bias or just creating a bigger story, the reporting of the event has not been balanced. Three examples:
- initially it was reported it was a private post. That has not been mentioned again subsequently. It is important in Situation where the crime is using Instagram to bring the game into disrepute.
- the media consistently reports it as a single picture rather than a series of four pictures.
- the media consistently says it is a post that shows a lack of remorse, rather than can be interpreted as a lack of remorse. As far as I can see there is no explanation of the story of May, and how this might provide context. In fact, the only part of May’s life that matters is the crime.
There are other examples, but these are three main ones.
So when Ivan, who has probably spoken to May (or at least knows him as a person) is on his side, then perhaps that is coming from a position with more knowledge of the context of the situation.
Now I have been in the camp of sacking May for a couple of years (and I wouldn’t re-sign Api also), but I don’t think we should do it just because Abigail Williams has labelled him a witch…