eelavation said:
the 10 players do not include Ben Smith, Ben however is one of 7 who came through development system at a very young age.
if you care so much, I can list the 10 players if you want...but only if you really give a sh*t, but something tells me that you're only interested in bagging my club out of spite..
10 out of 25 its 40%, so its hardly something to get cocky about.
ill give you a little tip, i dont actually hate the eels. i think they are a poor footy club that should be doing better given their resources though. their chief executive should be sacked as well. i think parra stand a good chance next year of making the GF, especially if tim smith gets sorted out.
BUT ....
if a parra fan (ED) wants to have a go at the most succesful club in the nrl over the past year, and probably the year before as well, ill just even up the score.
despite what people say, the storm do not get first choice at NRL players. they take players most other clubs dont want and improve them. theyve discovered how many origin players that the queensland nrl clubs missed out on ie inglis, slater and smith.
to really expect the storm to have any players in their FG squad after 10 years given RLs presence in victoria pre 1998 is really dumb. the swans have been around for 25 years and how many actual juniors do they have playing regular AFL each week. and thats with much more money to spend on juniors than RL has had to play with.
victoria is a big market in australia and we cant afford to ignore it. news ltd and the victorian government are investing millions into junior development now, we should be applauding that. there are 16 nrl clubs, and only 1 is in melbourne. why should we lose our melbourne club to gain a team in perth or the central coast. neither will add much to our TV deals like the storm could.
despite winning their premierships, we havent yet seen the real potential of the storm. the new ground, improved juniors and more access on victorian TV will all be achieved in the next 10 yrs