You asked the question
now you are shifting the goal posts massively
I haven't moved the goal posts at all. Your example doesn't even come close to living up to the criteria I set out.
Jim Jefferies isn't an A lister, he doesn't have the cash to do what Crowe did, so far there's no reason to believe that his connections are willing to commit anywhere near the kind of investment he'd require, and the Bears almost certainly wouldn't be interested in any offers for the club anyway.
the article literally says investing as in a Perth bears bid
Sure the article mentions Perth, but Jim is pretty inconspicuous on that subject. It's all "they could just be called "The Bears"', 'I know that they couldn't be based in Sydney, but we could play multiple games at NS Oval a year, and there's a lot of potential options for a base' BS.
No commitment to a relocation, no indication of a plan to build a new fanbase in a new market, just the same tired, old, and insulting, plan to simply use another market as a backdoor into league.
and when Crowe took over south’s he wasn’t that rich.
it’s later on when they got packer and the tech guy but even then they don’t put in money to fund the club.
He was however significantly richer than Jefferies is, and he had mates with personal fortunes in excess of hundreds of millions of dollars offering to help out.
Lets try to put it into perspective; Jefferies has an estimated net worth of around US$10mil. At the time Rusty bought the Rabbitohs his net worth would have be in the 10s of millions, almost certainly more that US$50mil, and is now worth somewhere between US$100-150mil.
Are you starting to see the difference yet?