Jesus here we go again. Here, I’ll correct your mistakes in your post.
You are (conjugate). You have lost (missing verb usage). people (conjugate). It’s not a third unless Sydney has a population of 6.5 million (significant mathematical error)
First sentence of second paragraph doesn’t make grammatical sense. If you are referring to GDP per capita (perhaps) you are wrong about that as well. I also said that there are other factors to contemplate when making an investment (misrepresentation - learn how to read)
They are (missing verb usage) the US/USA (A country is a noun so you put an article before the noun)
Jesus Christ. Fancy calling somebody else dumb after all that
On to the actual post itself
I’m not the one using a report commissioned for and by another sport to make a spurious point. You know this hence why you are deflecting. Again a report on the A-League (let’s face it the A-League is inconsequential) has absolutely no connection with the matter at hand. It doesn’t. You know it and I know it, so stop bulls******. Thus, I don’t have to concede anything.
In fact, as I said in my previous post there is no sporting competition in Australia that doesn’t have a Perth team. That in itself is something you can’t argue against.
You know why that is the case? I will spell it out for you in simple terms: it’s a lucrative market. It’s obviously not as lucrative as Sydney or Melbourne (I never once said that as well) but that doesn’t mean it’s not lucrative.
Only a brain dead moron would class a city of over 2 million with a high disposable income within a country with a low overall population like Australia as not ‘lucrative’. You can ignore or deflect that obvious point as much as you want; doesn’t make it any less obvious.