MugaB
Coach
- Messages
- 15,043
Dopes like Perth red will believe you
The only thing Balmain offers the joint venture is the Tigers logo, Balmain has no $$$, Western Suburbs does.So true, they need to fk that magpie off, and become the best tiger brand they can be
No they are actually Rabbitohs juniors from memoryI thought the Butcher’s came from the Central Coast?
eh? You do realise professional sports club are first and foremost businesses don’t you?why play at some large boring Stadium with no atmosphere just because it suits modern times.
Will you please just follow the Raiders, the Bears only want to play one game, yes one game at North Sydney Oval and that is against our hated arch rivals Manly Warringah.Aside from rent, why would they pay for the privilege to have their own team play out of the ground of their choosing? Whom would they even pay? Themselves lol!
You're on another planet if you think there's any reasonable possibility of the Bears forming a joint venture with a Perth based consortium where they aren't either majority stakeholders, or at a stretch, 50/50 split of the club but they hold the license.
Either way, they'd be calling the shots, there'd be nothing stopping them playing as many games as they wish at NSO, and they wouldn't really give two shits about the impact it'd have on Perth or the sport more broadly.
BTW, f**k Sydney memberships. Split home clubs are f**king commercial cancer. You're either a Perth club or a Sydney club, you can't be both at the same time to the best of your ability. In trying you'll only achieve being nothing to everybody, or in the Bears case a Sydney club with a token presence in Perth until they can justify cutting themselves loose of that burden.
Yes but the Tigers would draw more fans at Leichhardt oval and have a better fan atmosphere behind them than playing at Comm Bank Stadium.eh? You do realise professional sports club are first and foremost businesses don’t you?
They have two key kpi’s. 1. Make money 2. Win games, as many as possible.
new stadiums have shown time and again they help meet 1. Which then gives clubs more resources to achieve 2.
*brumbiesWill you please just follow the Raiders, the Bears only want to play one game, yes one game at North Sydney Oval and that is against our hated arch rivals Manly Warringah.
Now stop making things up.
He’d get lost and end up at concord ovalYes but the Tigers would draw more fans at Leichhardt oval and have a better fan atmosphere behind them than playing at Comm Bank Stadium.
You’ve really got to be there to experience it.
That’s a load of bseh? You do realise professional sports club are first and foremost businesses don’t you?
They have two key kpi’s. 1. Make money 2. Win games, as many as possible.
new stadiums have shown time and again they help meet 1. Which then gives clubs more resources to achieve 2.
tbf they’ve not said that, theyve said anywhere between 2-6 in statements theyve madeWill you please just follow the Raiders, the Bears only want to play one game, yes one game at North Sydney Oval and that is against our hated arch rivals Manly Warringah.
Now stop making things up.
Just because they aren’t achieving it doesn’t mean to say they aren’t all striving to do so!That’s a load of bs
many sports clubs run at a loss and are proposed up by owners
hullr kr we’re hardly a business those first decade in super league
Primary aim of a sports team is to win gamesJust because they aren’t achieving it doesn’t mean to say they aren’t all striving to do so!
Especially if privately owned. Ask any owner if they’d rather be pouring their own money in to keep a club afloat or if the club was making a profit for them. I think we know the answer!
Link?Primary aim of a sports team is to win games
most lose money and their owners don’t care
you know that too
Other than Leicester tigers every union club in the world loses money or breaks evenLink?
go and ask those English union club owners how they’re feeling about their clubs losing money lol
or Michael Searle,
or tony sage.
Owners pockets only go so deep. Every owner would rather their club was making them money rather than losing them it!
Haha link?Other than Leicester tigers every union club in the world loses money or breaks even
every single a league team loses money
what is happening in the nrl is unheard in sports
Nah your talking bs againHaha link?
plenty of sports clubs make a profit, in fact most do. if they didn’t they wouldn’t be around for long.
Really? So most soccer clubs aren’t making a profit? Nfl clubs? NBA clubs? Afl?, F1 teams? French union clubs (have you seen their revenue levels.)? And so it goes on.Nah your talking bs again
Yes really stop talking bollocksReally? So most soccer clubs aren’t making a profit? Nfl clubs? NBA clubs? Afl?, F1 teams? French union clubs (have you seen their revenue levels.)? And so it goes on.
if you have some evidence to share that nearly all professional sports clubs in the world are losing money please do share it!