The Great Dane
First Grade
- Messages
- 7,957
The Swans and Lions haven't played any games in Melbourne since relocating or being bought out respectively.That comment was based on the bears being owned by a WA consortium, not by the nsfc. They want a game in Sydney, then like other teams who take games on the road it needs to be paid for.
I dont think they will at all, it’s incredibly unlikely based on what we’ve heard so far from them. They would need to change dramatically to make it happen, maybe as they realise it’s not going to happen otherwise it might, but I doubt it.
that’s why the license and majority ownership must sit with the WA consortium. Not the nsfc. It will be a recipe for disaster if it ends up being owned by NS and why I wouldn’t bother supporting them With any fervour.
Tbf I don’t think we’ve had this scenario before in rl so Bit unfair to predict what may or may not happen. I can see it could work and tbh no business is going to turn away the opportunity for a potential 10k customers. Swans and lions still hold a healthy membership base in melbourne and are no longer seen as a split city club.
The closest situation to what is being proposed would be clubs that split significant amounts of games between venues, Wests Tigers, Dragons, GWS, North Melbourne, etc, and it's had major negative impacts pretty much universally. Even then nobody has split games between such a large geographical and cultural gap as Sydney and Perth, and frankly that's because it would be an absolute farce.
Besides, as far as we know from what's publicly available the Bears have had no serious discussions with any entities from WA about merging. They've only had initial discussions with the WA government about what they'd offer the Bears to base an NRL side in Perth. Hypothetically, the possibility of a merger could have been brought up in those discussions, who knows for sure, but I can guarantee that that was not the gist of the Bears proposal.
Last edited: