Perth Red
Post Whore
- Messages
- 70,407
Troll done good!Perth has no stroke. Behind Christchurch & PNG right now
Gold Coast Chargers were profitable when they were culled in 1999. Their exclusion was a compromise between News Ltd and ARL to grant the Broncos sole representation of southeast Queensland until 2007.So where is a copy of this report. All we have is hand me down quotes
You also fail to mention after 1985 Wests court case - they reverted to let clubs die naturally
So the clubs that died naturally rather than as a result of the SL War and the flawed criteria cull - were Gold Coast and Auckland
Yep he’s definitely trolling. I’m never sure why anybody does this.Troll done good!
He is creating an argument in his own mind. Nobody (or indeed not many) have mentioned anything about dumping sides. All we are talking about the merits of this idea
Gold Coast Chargers were profitable when they were culled in 1999. Their exclusion was a compromise between News Ltd and ARL to grant the Broncos sole representation of southeast Queensland until 2007.
The Bradley Report was written in August 1992 by Dr G Bradley and handed to all clubs.
On 9 April 1992 A blueprint for the expansion of Rugby League was tabled by the Premiership Policy Committee of the NSWRL, followed in August by an Organisation Review, by Dr G. Bradley, which was distributed to the premiership clubs. The Bradley Report, as it became known, was central to the ARL replacing the NSWRL as the governing body of the premiership. The report concluded that:"...to reduce the number of clubs in Sydney, will be very hard for the League to implement given the long playing traditions of some of those clubs. In the long term, however, it is likely that Sydney is not going to be able to support eleven clubs as it does at present. Therefore in the long term this is the only viable solution. Sydney based clubs are going to have to move to new areas, merge or be relegated from the League. This is going to be a painful process. In the long term I believe that the ARL should be looking to reduce the number of clubs in the National Competition to fourteen, thus allowing clubs to play two complete rounds. This will mean, assuming that only four new clubs are admitted from areas outside Sydney, that there will be only five clubs based in Sydney."
Each club received a letter of invitation for the 1995 season on 2 May 1994. Included were a number of admission criteria including the ability to "attract a minimum average home attendance of 10,000 people". Balmain, Easts, Gold Coast, Illawarra, Parramatta, Penrith, Souths, St George and Wests failed this criterion for 1995 . After the privately owned Brisbane Broncos transferred a 20% share of their company to Northern Rivers Ltd, the new shareholders received the following:"Under the terms of the League's Constitution, it is necessary that, without exception, all clubs which wish to participate in the League's Premiership competition, must apply each year for admission. No club has any automatic right to participate in any year's competition and the League has the unfettered right to reject any club's application for participation."
Super League war | Detailed Pedia
Contents 1Background 1.1Early Rumblings of Super League and the Bradley Report 2The Super League war 2.1Proposals for a breakaway competition 2.2The war planning continues...www.detailedpedia.com
That really is a terrible stadium for rugby league
Tbf some of the things he’s arguing against have been said by grotd.Yep he’s definitely trolling. I’m never sure why anybody does this.
Attendances and television ratings for most Sydney clubs are beyond woeful. There are games between Sydney teams that draw as few as 6k or 7k fans. Financially, none of them are thriving and would be in deep shit without the annual grant. I've shown the data for attendances and television ratings ad nauseum to validate my point.You’ve advocated the removal of Sydney clubs unconvincingly and I’m yet to see a strong argument for not having 9 Sydney clubs.
I wasnt talking about the cull, even though they needed to be saved twice before thisGold Coast Chargers were profitable when they were culled in 1999. Their exclusion was a compromise between News Ltd and ARL to grant the Broncos sole representation of southeast Queensland until 2007.
Like all ovals it’s not great viewing for rectangular sports. But as a stadium it’s brilliant, great food,great toilets,great lighting, easy transport from any part of the city, great area outside stadium, option to stand on the concourse and drink whilst watching game. Some great upgrade options like seating sections with your own bar, food and terrace area.It ticks all the boxes.That really is a terrible stadium for rugby league
I thought the site lines where so much better
Troll done good!
Attendances and television ratings for most Sydney clubs are beyond woeful. There are games between Sydney teams that draw as few as 6k or 7k fans. Financially, none of them are thriving and would be in deep shit without the annual grant. I've shown the data for attendances and television ratings ad nauseum to validate my point.
When you start listening to what news ltd say then your in cuckoo land lol. I’ve shown you where the latest two comments from nrl officials have not specified nz2 above anyone else.Well the media is saying that & officials in NRL have already said nz should be next. Guess they're trolling too?!
Gold Coast Chargers were profitable when they were culled in 1999. Their exclusion was a compromise between News Ltd and ARL to grant the Broncos sole representation of southeast Queensland until 2007.
The Bradley Report was written in August 1992 by Dr G Bradley and handed to all clubs.
On 9 April 1992 A blueprint for the expansion of Rugby League was tabled by the Premiership Policy Committee of the NSWRL, followed in August by an Organisation Review, by Dr G. Bradley, which was distributed to the premiership clubs. The Bradley Report, as it became known, was central to the ARL replacing the NSWRL as the governing body of the premiership. The report concluded that:"...to reduce the number of clubs in Sydney, will be very hard for the League to implement given the long playing traditions of some of those clubs. In the long term, however, it is likely that Sydney is not going to be able to support eleven clubs as it does at present. Therefore in the long term this is the only viable solution. Sydney based clubs are going to have to move to new areas, merge or be relegated from the League. This is going to be a painful process. In the long term I believe that the ARL should be looking to reduce the number of clubs in the National Competition to fourteen, thus allowing clubs to play two complete rounds. This will mean, assuming that only four new clubs are admitted from areas outside Sydney, that there will be only five clubs based in Sydney."
Each club received a letter of invitation for the 1995 season on 2 May 1994. Included were a number of admission criteria including the ability to "attract a minimum average home attendance of 10,000 people". Balmain, Easts, Gold Coast, Illawarra, Parramatta, Penrith, Souths, St George and Wests failed this criterion for 1995 . After the privately owned Brisbane Broncos transferred a 20% share of their company to Northern Rivers Ltd, the new shareholders received the following:"Under the terms of the League's Constitution, it is necessary that, without exception, all clubs which wish to participate in the League's Premiership competition, must apply each year for admission. No club has any automatic right to participate in any year's competition and the League has the unfettered right to reject any club's application for participation."
Super League war | Detailed Pedia
Contents 1Background 1.1Early Rumblings of Super League and the Bradley Report 2The Super League war 2.1Proposals for a breakaway competition 2.2The war planning continues...www.detailedpedia.com
How did it fail crowd wise? At no point in their three seasons were they the comps worse supported club. In fact each year they finished above a number of sydney clubs in the attendance table.Ha - that's a one off. One time city had team is only thing we can say for fact & it failed. Rest is speculation
haha so what evidence would you like? How about two stadium record crowds?
View attachment 61608
How did it fail crowd wise? At no point in their three seasons were they the comps worse supported club. In fact each year they finished above a number of sydney clubs in the attendance table.
‘14&’15What year was that?!