What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

WA BEARS

Messages
14,822
So where is a copy of this report. All we have is hand me down quotes

You also fail to mention after 1985 Wests court case - they reverted to let clubs die naturally

So the clubs that died naturally rather than as a result of the SL War and the flawed criteria cull - were Gold Coast and Auckland
Gold Coast Chargers were profitable when they were culled in 1999. Their exclusion was a compromise between News Ltd and ARL to grant the Broncos sole representation of southeast Queensland until 2007.

The Bradley Report was written in August 1992 by Dr G Bradley and handed to all clubs.

On 9 April 1992 A blueprint for the expansion of Rugby League was tabled by the Premiership Policy Committee of the NSWRL, followed in August by an Organisation Review, by Dr G. Bradley, which was distributed to the premiership clubs. The Bradley Report, as it became known, was central to the ARL replacing the NSWRL as the governing body of the premiership. The report concluded that:

"...to reduce the number of clubs in Sydney, will be very hard for the League to implement given the long playing traditions of some of those clubs. In the long term, however, it is likely that Sydney is not going to be able to support eleven clubs as it does at present. Therefore in the long term this is the only viable solution. Sydney based clubs are going to have to move to new areas, merge or be relegated from the League. This is going to be a painful process. In the long term I believe that the ARL should be looking to reduce the number of clubs in the National Competition to fourteen, thus allowing clubs to play two complete rounds. This will mean, assuming that only four new clubs are admitted from areas outside Sydney, that there will be only five clubs based in Sydney."​

Each club received a letter of invitation for the 1995 season on 2 May 1994. Included were a number of admission criteria including the ability to "attract a minimum average home attendance of 10,000 people". Balmain, Easts, Gold Coast, Illawarra, Parramatta, Penrith, Souths, St George and Wests failed this criterion for 1995 . After the privately owned Brisbane Broncos transferred a 20% share of their company to Northern Rivers Ltd, the new shareholders received the following:

"Under the terms of the League's Constitution, it is necessary that, without exception, all clubs which wish to participate in the League's Premiership competition, must apply each year for admission. No club has any automatic right to participate in any year's competition and the League has the unfettered right to reject any club's application for participation."​

 
Last edited:

Wb1234

Immortal
Messages
35,336
He is creating an argument in his own mind. Nobody (or indeed not many) have mentioned anything about dumping sides. All we are talking about the merits of this idea
Gold Coast Chargers were profitable when they were culled in 1999. Their exclusion was a compromise between News Ltd and ARL to grant the Broncos sole representation of southeast Queensland until 2007.

The Bradley Report was written in August 1992 by Dr G Bradley and handed to all clubs.

On 9 April 1992 A blueprint for the expansion of Rugby League was tabled by the Premiership Policy Committee of the NSWRL, followed in August by an Organisation Review, by Dr G. Bradley, which was distributed to the premiership clubs. The Bradley Report, as it became known, was central to the ARL replacing the NSWRL as the governing body of the premiership. The report concluded that:​
"...to reduce the number of clubs in Sydney, will be very hard for the League to implement given the long playing traditions of some of those clubs. In the long term, however, it is likely that Sydney is not going to be able to support eleven clubs as it does at present. Therefore in the long term this is the only viable solution. Sydney based clubs are going to have to move to new areas, merge or be relegated from the League. This is going to be a painful process. In the long term I believe that the ARL should be looking to reduce the number of clubs in the National Competition to fourteen, thus allowing clubs to play two complete rounds. This will mean, assuming that only four new clubs are admitted from areas outside Sydney, that there will be only five clubs based in Sydney."​

Each club received a letter of invitation for the 1995 season on 2 May 1994. Included were a number of admission criteria including the ability to "attract a minimum average home attendance of 10,000 people". Balmain, Easts, Gold Coast, Illawarra, Parramatta, Penrith, Souths, St George and Wests failed this criterion for 1995 . After the privately owned Brisbane Broncos transferred a 20% share of their company to Northern Rivers Ltd, the new shareholders received the following:​
"Under the terms of the League's Constitution, it is necessary that, without exception, all clubs which wish to participate in the League's Premiership competition, must apply each year for admission. No club has any automatic right to participate in any year's competition and the League has the unfettered right to reject any club's application for participation."​



so the broncos didn’t just want the crushers killed off they wanted the seagulls too ?

thanks for that even more justification for hating super league
 
Messages
14,822
You’ve advocated the removal of Sydney clubs unconvincingly and I’m yet to see a strong argument for not having 9 Sydney clubs.
Attendances and television ratings for most Sydney clubs are beyond woeful. There are games between Sydney teams that draw as few as 6k or 7k fans. Financially, none of them are thriving and would be in deep shit without the annual grant. I've shown the data for attendances and television ratings ad nauseum to validate my point.
 

siv

First Grade
Messages
6,772
Gold Coast Chargers were profitable when they were culled in 1999. Their exclusion was a compromise between News Ltd and ARL to grant the Broncos sole representation of southeast Queensland until 2007.
I wasnt talking about the cull, even though they needed to be saved twice before this

Its the 2014 period

Also still no pdf of the original 30y old report, which is looking more and more out of date
 

Perth Red

Post Whore
Messages
70,407
That really is a terrible stadium for rugby league

I thought the site lines where so much better
Like all ovals it’s not great viewing for rectangular sports. But as a stadium it’s brilliant, great food,great toilets,great lighting, easy transport from any part of the city, great area outside stadium, option to stand on the concourse and drink whilst watching game. Some great upgrade options like seating sections with your own bar, food and terrace area.It ticks all the boxes.
 

Pippen94

First Grade
Messages
7,537
Attendances and television ratings for most Sydney clubs are beyond woeful. There are games between Sydney teams that draw as few as 6k or 7k fans. Financially, none of them are thriving and would be in deep shit without the annual grant. I've shown the data for attendances and television ratings ad nauseum to validate my point.

Mate, we've been through this a million times. All struggling clubs most recently have been the regional ones.
 

Perth Red

Post Whore
Messages
70,407
Well the media is saying that & officials in NRL have already said nz should be next. Guess they're trolling too?!
When you start listening to what news ltd say then your in cuckoo land lol. I’ve shown you where the latest two comments from nrl officials have not specified nz2 above anyone else.
 

Pippen94

First Grade
Messages
7,537
Gold Coast Chargers were profitable when they were culled in 1999. Their exclusion was a compromise between News Ltd and ARL to grant the Broncos sole representation of southeast Queensland until 2007.

The Bradley Report was written in August 1992 by Dr G Bradley and handed to all clubs.

On 9 April 1992 A blueprint for the expansion of Rugby League was tabled by the Premiership Policy Committee of the NSWRL, followed in August by an Organisation Review, by Dr G. Bradley, which was distributed to the premiership clubs. The Bradley Report, as it became known, was central to the ARL replacing the NSWRL as the governing body of the premiership. The report concluded that:​
"...to reduce the number of clubs in Sydney, will be very hard for the League to implement given the long playing traditions of some of those clubs. In the long term, however, it is likely that Sydney is not going to be able to support eleven clubs as it does at present. Therefore in the long term this is the only viable solution. Sydney based clubs are going to have to move to new areas, merge or be relegated from the League. This is going to be a painful process. In the long term I believe that the ARL should be looking to reduce the number of clubs in the National Competition to fourteen, thus allowing clubs to play two complete rounds. This will mean, assuming that only four new clubs are admitted from areas outside Sydney, that there will be only five clubs based in Sydney."​

Each club received a letter of invitation for the 1995 season on 2 May 1994. Included were a number of admission criteria including the ability to "attract a minimum average home attendance of 10,000 people". Balmain, Easts, Gold Coast, Illawarra, Parramatta, Penrith, Souths, St George and Wests failed this criterion for 1995 . After the privately owned Brisbane Broncos transferred a 20% share of their company to Northern Rivers Ltd, the new shareholders received the following:​
"Under the terms of the League's Constitution, it is necessary that, without exception, all clubs which wish to participate in the League's Premiership competition, must apply each year for admission. No club has any automatic right to participate in any year's competition and the League has the unfettered right to reject any club's application for participation."​



Great, that's build game around 30 year old report which doesn't take into account media rights exploding, as well as population growth in NSW & qld mainly being around Sydney & Brisbane
 

Perth Red

Post Whore
Messages
70,407
Ha - that's a one off. One time city had team is only thing we can say for fact & it failed. Rest is speculation
How did it fail crowd wise? At no point in their three seasons were they the comps worse supported club. In fact each year they finished above a number of sydney clubs in the attendance table.
 

Pippen94

First Grade
Messages
7,537
How did it fail crowd wise? At no point in their three seasons were they the comps worse supported club. In fact each year they finished above a number of sydney clubs in the attendance table.

Great success. Where are the reds now?!
 

Latest posts

Top