What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

WA BEARS

titoelcolombiano

First Grade
Messages
6,620
I don't think the Jets or Fiji has submitted any bid. It's only formations and speculation for future bidding.

I don't think that the Bears have broken an NDA but the fact an NDA exists means the NRL would appreciate calm waters on the media front in the bidding process.. which the Bears aren't reading the room so to speak.
There's 11 bids.. I'm sure they all have a lot to say.. only staying silent and being respectful in the best play if you want the gig.
Ipswich Jets Chairman confirmed that they submitted a bid. From the attached article:

Ipswich Jets chairman Steven Johnson confirmed the bid, stating, “Yes, we have put in a bid. I think Queensland has room for another team. Without talking about the specific merits of any particular bid, the game can easily support another team in Queensland without affecting the existing four clubs. The western corridor of Brisbane has a great nursery, it’s the Penrith of Queensland, so we’ve expressed interest and we look forward to the bid process.”

 

Centy Coast

Juniors
Messages
1,751
I thought the CC had plenty of juniors…. That’s Roosters area isn’t it?

(sorry)
The Central Coasts Junior Reps come under the Roosters banner but not our local competition.
Only Sandon Smith has come through the Roosters Central Coast pathways which is a massive fail when you look at the talent in the NRL from the Central Coast.
The Roosters NRLW team has a heap of Central Coast talent, I think 10 players or more.
Their Coach John Strange preferred his son Ethan to come through the Raiders.
 

jim_57

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
4,602
Wests Tigers to split.
obviously the Magpies and Tigers will both be in the competition, so bad luck Perth Bears
(sarcasm)

Jesus, how delusional are Balmain? There is no stand alone Balmain Tigers in the NRL if they pull out of the merger.

I’m sure if it came to the crunch Wests Tigers would be able to continue with the Tigers name as well, given they’ve been using it for the last 25 years. Happy to be corrected.
 

Nuke

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
5,361
Ipswich Jets Chairman confirmed that they submitted a bid. From the attached article:

Ipswich Jets chairman Steven Johnson confirmed the bid, stating, “Yes, we have put in a bid. I think Queensland has room for another team. Without talking about the specific merits of any particular bid, the game can easily support another team in Queensland without affecting the existing four clubs. The western corridor of Brisbane has a great nursery, it’s the Penrith of Queensland, so we’ve expressed interest and we look forward to the bid process.”

Not sure what the date is that this was released, but if that's a recent article (as in the last couple of weeks), then, umm, I think they missed the deadline if they're only talking about having 'expressed an interest' and they are looking forward to 'the bid process'.
 

Nuke

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
5,361
Jesus, how delusional are Balmain? There is no stand alone Balmain Tigers in the NRL if they pull out of the merger.

I’m sure if it came to the crunch Wests Tigers would be able to continue with the Tigers name as well, given they’ve been using it for the last 25 years. Happy to be corrected.
Not sure if it was in this article or another one I read on this subject earlier today, but the main driver of this de-merging reportedly said that he's keen to push for Balmain to be a stand-alone NRL team, even if it failing means Balmain is consigned to the NSW Cup forever.

Sounds like he knows the outcome already.

Same article said Balmain only own 10% of the Wests Tigers club while Western Suburbs owns 30%.

That club, a quarter of a century after its beginning, is still divided, factions pushing and pulling for control, distrust in the other half. They still can't get along. They have players who weren't even born when they started, yet they're still the immature ones. Stand alone, the two clubs, in an already saturated Sydney market, fail. Stay together, it's still infighting and amateur hour.

I think Balmain sees North Sydney being revived of sorts, hears of Newtown attempting to revive itself, again, of sorts, and thinks to themselves 'If all these old clubs can comeback, we deserve it too. We should be back in the NRL'. They're seeing the door being opened for them and feel like walking in as well.

As others have said a while back: a way that it would work is if they divorce eachother and Balmain joins forces with Brisbane Easts for the NRL Team20 bid. Wests, if they're strong enough, claim the Wests Tigers licence and reclaim the (Western Sydney?) Magpies name.
Otherwise, it's 'bye-bye' to the both of them, the Wests Tigers are no more, the comp has an extra spot available, and the NRL has the chance of filling it with whichever bid doesn't fit the quota of Perth, PNG, NZ2, Bris3, Fiji, ect.

Maybe this would be a blessing, as it could also help de-clutter the Sydney market and have expansion without having to expand the comp beyond 20 teams.
 

Wb1234

Immortal
Messages
33,590
“and has been met with universal support from NRL clubs and attracted interest from major sponsors from within a robust WA economy and also from interstate and overseas.”

glen Quartermaine is a fumbler reporter too so good to see the heathers coming on board
 

Wb1234

Immortal
Messages
33,590
Not sure if it was in this article or another one I read on this subject earlier today, but the main driver of this de-merging reportedly said that he's keen to push for Balmain to be a stand-alone NRL team, even if it failing means Balmain is consigned to the NSW Cup forever.

Sounds like he knows the outcome already.

Same article said Balmain only own 10% of the Wests Tigers club while Western Suburbs owns 30%.

That club, a quarter of a century after its beginning, is still divided, factions pushing and pulling for control, distrust in the other half. They still can't get along. They have players who weren't even born when they started, yet they're still the immature ones. Stand alone, the two clubs, in an already saturated Sydney market, fail. Stay together, it's still infighting and amateur hour.

I think Balmain sees North Sydney being revived of sorts, hears of Newtown attempting to revive itself, again, of sorts, and thinks to themselves 'If all these old clubs can comeback, we deserve it too. We should be back in the NRL'. They're seeing the door being opened for them and feel like walking in as well.

As others have said a while back: a way that it would work is if they divorce eachother and Balmain joins forces with Brisbane Easts for the NRL Team20 bid. Wests, if they're strong enough, claim the Wests Tigers licence and reclaim the (Western Sydney?) Magpies name.
Otherwise, it's 'bye-bye' to the both of them, the Wests Tigers are no more, the comp has an extra spot available, and the NRL has the chance of filling it with whichever bid doesn't fit the quota of Perth, PNG, NZ2, Bris3, Fiji, ect.

Maybe this would be a blessing, as it could also help de-clutter the Sydney market and have expansion without having to expand the comp beyond 20 teams.
Balmain own 10 percent
Holman Barnes (wests leagues) owns the rest

wests magpies own 30 percent of west leagues
 

Wb1234

Immortal
Messages
33,590
Wasn’t that 10% basically a gift when they were contributing zero funding. Wests Ashfield could have taken 100% but chose to only take 90% to keep the Tigers in the Tigers.
That’s my memory anyway.
It was 50 50 split

Balmain borrowed money from the arl and couldn’t pay it back so wests did and took 40 percent

and yeh they could’ve taken the lot but didn’t want to kill off Balmain
 

RedVee

First Grade
Messages
7,037
It was 50 50 split

Balmain borrowed money from the arl and couldn’t pay it back so wests did and took 40 percent

and yeh they could’ve taken the lot but didn’t want to kill off Balmain
Can Balmain even afford to run an independent NSW Cup team? Or would they have to co-opt Ryde-Eastwood again? (Assuming one of their billionaire supporters doesn’t fund it).
 

Wb1234

Immortal
Messages
33,590
Can Balmain even afford to run an independent NSW Cup team? Or would they have to co-opt Ryde-Eastwood again? (Assuming one of their billionaire supporters doesn’t fund it).
Probably not

wests will own 90 percent of the Balmain leagues club when it’s finished construction

they would be hoping rich owner plus members

if they join with easts tigers in qld they will end up with less home games at leichardt

wests have done nothing wrong here this is all balmains making and they are seeing norths and Newtown trying to get back in and want to copy it
 

BuffaloRules

Coach
Messages
15,451
Probably not

wests will own 90 percent of the Balmain leagues club when it’s finished construction

they would be hoping rich owner plus members

if they join with easts tigers in qld they will end up with less home games at leichardt

wests have done nothing wrong here this is all balmains making and they are seeing norths and Newtown trying to get back in and want to copy it

Why would they join up with Brisbane … ? To retain the tigers name … which they have now already ?

I was reading the Telegraph this morning … the story looks like it’s been walked back considerably by the Balmain Chairman … could have just been a case of one of their dinosaur board members going rogue
 

Wb1234

Immortal
Messages
33,590
Why would they join up with Brisbane … ? To retain the tigers name … which they have now already ?

I was reading the Telegraph this morning … the story looks like it’s been walked back considerably by the Balmain Chairman … could have just been a case of one of their dinosaur board members going rogue
Jersey basically

Garry Leo is the board guy who wants out ex player too
 

Latest posts

Top