FTR he didn't break his leg this year - it was ligament damage and a small broken bone in his foot.roopy said:yes - those are the skinny legs he has broken twice in two seasons - someone told me he spends an extra 20 hours a week in the gym - doesn't show
yeah - i overstated it - but i have to say i saw him get both injuries and it just looked like simple tackles - nothing spectacular - the one last year he was the tackler and ended up on the bottom of the pile with a broken leg.Frederick said:FTR he didn't break his leg this year - it was ligament damage and a small broken bone in his foot.
LINKWalsh next in Knights' No.7 line
Daniel Lane | May 20, 2007
NSW Origin boom boy Jarrod Mullen's days as Newcastle's halfback are numbered.
The Knights are grooming yet another talented 20-year-old - Luke Walsh - to push Mullen back to his preferred position at five-eighth.
He's already received a public endorsement from Newcastle coach Brian Smith, who described Walsh to a group of schoolchildren during the Knights' pre-season tour of the Queensland outback as one of the most talented young players he'd seen.
He said all Walsh needed to do was bulk up. Talent is not an issue. Walsh (at halfback) and Mullen (five-eighth) were the halves combination for the NSW under-19 squad lasy year after coming through Newcastle West junior teams together. It was suggested that Walsh might play first grade when Andrew Johns struggled with the neck problem that led to his retirement.
The Knights were concerned about the way Mullen at halfback and Kurt Gidley at pivot were gelling. However, any chance he may have had to play first grade was dashed by a leg injury that sidelined him for eight weeks.
While Walsh returned in the premier league match against the Dragons at Wollongong on Friday night, Knights development officer Warren Smiles was reluctant to say too much about the club's latest protege. "He's being assessed," he said.
what keeney said. we don't have to replace johns with another johns. mullen is a natural 5/8th and it's very evident when he plays. just because he can cut it in the #7 doesn't mean walsh wont be our future halfback.keeney said:@ CJ despite your post being almost nonsensical and containing double negatives that contradict your intention, it is the profound lack of knowledge concerning modern rugby league that continues to set you apart as a poster.
Point being. Mullen was born to wear the #6 on his back, all the breaks he makes and stuff he sets up is generally afforded when being another pass wider of the ruck. The fact that he is good enough to play 7 doesn't mean its his best position. In fact it is only due to the increasing similarities between the two and his skill that he has excelled closer in, and even then you notice the damper on his game.
If we have a natural 7 coming through, to partner our natural 6, why the hell would we keep them out of position, merely because one is playing well despite the disadvantage?
Sure Mullen is the future for Newcastle, and potentially NSW, but that means nothing to what jumper he has to wear on his back. You like every other teen girl out there is concerned about replacing Joey, its not something that requires another #7 necessarily, it is merely ouir lack of genuine playmakers that has made us take this step.
Hmm, yes, I see your point. Joey played at Hooker for NSW, yet the Knights absolutely refused to move him from halfback into his obvious best position as he was the current NSW Hooker. Real c**k up by the Knights there, eh?christopherjon said:It's still a big call to move the NSW HALFBACK to 5/8 for his club. I mean, what if he kills it for NSW playing mostly first receiver? And we want to shove him back to 5/8? I don't think so. Mullen is the future of Newcastle and *fingers crossed* NSW too. I doubt that unless he has a series of terrible games, he will not be moving anywhere. Any other halves wanting to crack FG (Walsh, Dureau, Karawana, Bailey) will just have to do so at 5/8 and let Mullen run the team like he has been doing so successfully.
keeney said:True enough, buit Tim is trying to validate the lightness of one player with players who are substantially heavier than him. Thought I should draw the line.