bullsh*t!!!!skeepe said:Well done NRL
![]()
IanG said:bullsh*t!!!!
skeepe said:They had to take a stand. As a referee myself, if I or one of my touchies reported that sort of abuse directed at them, I would not hesitate to send the culprit off.
It boils down to this: Officials cannot be abused. Johns abused an official using the strongest possible language. It deserves the strongest possible sanction.
skeepe said:They had to take a stand. As a referee myself, if I or one of my touchies reported that sort of abuse directed at them, I would not hesitate to send the culprit off.
It boils down to this: Officials cannot be abused. Johns abused an official using the strongest possible language. It deserves the strongest possible sanction.
skeepe said:They had to take a stand. As a referee myself, if I or one of my touchies reported that sort of abuse directed at them, I would not hesitate to send the culprit off.
skeepe said:They had to take a stand. As a referee myself, if I or one of my touchies reported that sort of abuse directed at them, I would not hesitate to send the culprit off.
It boils down to this: Officials cannot be abused. Johns abused an official using the strongest possible language. It deserves the strongest possible sanction.
Jobdog said:Skeepe, piss off. Take your high and mighty morals back to the Faiders or NRL forum :arrow:
skeepe said:Whats your problem mate?
I'm merely commenting on the issue. I'm also not trolling. If you've got a problem with the MRC, fair enough. Don't take it out on me.
macavity said:the Knights should get back at the NRL somehow if he is suspended. No idea how, but this is damn petty and targeted stuff and should be met in kind.
Burwood said:Can you see the difference between sending a player off and suspending them for three or four weeks? The referee made the mistake of not sending Johns off during the game, but I fail to see how this should result in him getting a higher charge.