The refs should use the words of the rule when explaining decisions. "In my opinion, a try would have been scored but for the unfair play etc"I still don’t know how that penalty try was awarded when you read the rules on penalty try’s
![]()
Refs paraphrasing the rules is half the problem because it's not the rule and whatever the VR and on-field ref said about the Jennings try just sounded like they were making it up as they go along
Regardless, I don't believe a try WOULD have been scored but for the unfair play. It May have been scored, but WOULD HAVE? Not imo, not even close to that standard.