Only one player had symptoms. If the entire broncos squad is found to have swine flu, it then becomes a national health issue not a NRL or club issue you dopey moron.[FKN-SIK];5715264 said:The flu shouldn't be an excuse. I'm sure there is players to replace them...
I didn't see the dragons or gold coast forfeit or cancel the match. Play the game or forfeit.
Are all the broncs planning on spitting/coughing on every fan at the game ?"They should still play, f**k em" and then 40 odd thousand spectators all end up with the virus.
It's not a forfeit if the government issues the quarantine.[FKN-SIK];5715299 said:I'm quite sure that's what people call a forfeit...
lol, nice argument.:roll::roll:
It's not a forfeit if the government issues the quarantine.
FMD toast is smarter than you.
Rolling your eyes and disagreeing with my comments would indicate you don't agree with me. Whats the opposite of agreeing? Arguing I think you'll find.I was not intending to argue anything, why is it always an argument with you ?
Well, it is a reply your comment probably deserved.
Whats the opposite of agreeing?
"They should still play, f**k em" and then 40 odd thousand spectators all end up with the virus.
This is dumb, the common flu has a higher mortality rate ffs
and is there really that a great a differnce between the two? Of course there isn't.Disagreeing, perhaps?
and is there really that a great a differnce between the two? Of course there isn't.
Won't happen. Stop making excuses.
I'm sure Gallop flagged some potential for rescheduling if the swine flu became an issue in the NRL, if it happens I just hope neither team is too severely disadvantaged because of it.
How do you figure? What symptoms lead you to your diagnosis doc? You really think a club will voluntarily quarantine all their players in an effort to get a little more rest?