saint.nick
Coach
- Messages
- 19,401
But where'd you hear that Jacko?
That site I told you about mate. Henry and FSG have been getting lots of advice about making sure the next step we take is the right one. I think results like the one overnight will speed up the process of giving Rodgers the tap on the shoulder.
I want to see this team win the League and more Champions Leagues as much as any other Liverpool fan, however I want more than that. I want a team who are consistently in the running for titles and silverware. I want a team with a strong culture. This is not achieved by constantly sacking managers when results take a turn for the worse or they make underwhelming purchases in a transfer window. Sacking the manager means you have to rebuild the teams' culture yet again- haven't we done that enough these past 5 years?
While I agree that any manager (and the players) need to be held accountable for results long-term, I feel that the #rodgersout# brigade are jumping the gun and forgetting that:
a) Not only has the #1 goalscorer from the squad last season departed, but the #2 goalscorer has been out injured virtually all season thus far, and
b) BR made purchases in the last transfer window before that #2 goalscorer was injured.
If Sturridge comes back and BR's attempts to bolster the squad come January see little or no progress then sure, FSG ought to be giving more thought to a replacement. But I'm done with this "Let's sack the manager and bring in manager A,B,C who is the answer to all our problems because he's won stuff before with (insert team name)" mentality. More often than not, it's a bandaid solution and you end up going round in circles chasing some miracle cure.
Heaven's sake, in spite of everything else, we're 12 rounds in and Liverpool are just 5 points out of the Champions League spots, but some 'fans' are carrying on like a bunch of entitlement-minded plastics who sound like they pay attention to little else about the club than the match day results!
Hearing of the scouting team being sacked is positive- it indicates the board is looking at improving the club at a nuts and bolts level, as opposed to relying on a new manager or star signing to solve all the problems. De Boer and Cruyf sound like a managerial pair that could be worth taking a gamble on- as long as the club is prepared to give them time to enact the changes as they see fit and not put a line through their names the moment the team struggles. Man United were patient and showed faith in Fergie- despite the fans growing restless and wanting him sacked- and look at how it paid off for them!
Heaven knows, the biggest problem with Liverpool the past 25 years has been consistency. In that time there have been probably 4 seasons where the regular team has been a serious title contender. Apart from that, there hasn't been much in the way of sustained pressure. The haters bag the club and its' fans off for dwelling on past glories, but how on Earth can anybody expect the club to develop a strong culture of success and solidarity if managers are being chopped and changed every few seasons? Granted, the 90's was a bit of a hangover from the golden era, and Roy Hodgson was a complete 'WTF?' appointment from Day 1, but I'd at least hope FSG realise that resurrecting the club to former glory is going to require patience and solid foundations.
If BR has to go, so be it (even though I am prepared to reserve judgement on him a little longer). But please- no quick fixes as his replacement! No big name managers with little more than an overseas reputation, no cut-price managers either. We need a manager with a clear idea of how they want their teams to play and the culture they want their players to be a part of, and a record indicating that allowing them to do this brings repeated success that is attributed to more than a fluke season.
Liverpool don't have the money that Chelsea or City have to offer a manager, but they have enough to attract the sort of manager I've just mentioned. We may not be able to spend the most, but we can spend the wisest. That's what's most important.