What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Zac Lomax

Jbjbjb40

Juniors
Messages
75
Did anyone see what Gould was saying about Lomax going to Parra for $650k a year?
He seems to believe saints would have $200k taken off our cap to make up the difference because he was valued at $850k? I know he is losing it a bit but he is not stupid
 

hook hook

Juniors
Messages
226
Did anyone see what Gould was saying about Lomax going to Parra for $650k a year?
He seems to believe saints would have $200k taken off our cap to make up the difference because he was valued at $850k? I know he is losing it a bit but he is not stupid
No way, it’s not a transfer the contract is terminated which should while saints of all obligation.
 

St Tangles

Bench
Messages
3,149
Did anyone see what Gould was saying about Lomax going to Parra for $650k a year?
He seems to believe saints would have $200k taken off our cap to make up the difference because he was valued at $850k? I know he is losing it a bit but he is not stupid
He was hypothesising
Saying we should carry the difference

Probably one of the dumbest things I've heard him say
 

Mojo

Bench
Messages
4,122
Did anyone see what Gould was saying about Lomax going to Parra for $650k a year?
He seems to believe saints would have $200k taken off our cap to make up the difference because he was valued at $850k? I know he is losing it a bit but he is not stupid
Which 'he' are you referring to - Lomax or Gould? They're a pair of prize nongs IMO.
 

Slippery Morris

First Grade
Messages
7,895
Gould saying rubbish as usual? Are they carrying any cap for TPG? He is on peanuts playing league in Qld until he eventually runs out for the Broncos.

What Gould does not understand is Lomax asked for the release. When people like Slater or whoever say that clubs release players when it suits them is crap. Saints clearly want Zac and value him highly yet he decided to put in a release, have dinner with a coach from another team and whinge about playing wing. I am sure the Saints would like to have him at the Saints but he just does not want to be there so why should they foot the bill. Like Gallen said, Parra or who ever ends up with him should fit the bill and have to fork out the full amount. Other wise ever team can jag a player for a bargain and get the other team to foot half the bill. How dumb is that. If that is the case Roosters should offer Lomax 400k as Saints will pay the other 450k. I am sure Lomax would rather play at Roosters than the Eels who won't win a comp in a hurry.
 
Messages
17,187
If we end up with Latrell, it will be the end of my lifelong support of the Dragons.
Mmm..I understand and if he joined WT I would return my membership and that of the dog.

But you have the best man manager coach in the game, imho, he’d be capable of getting the filth and wanton violence out of Lats’ game and turning him into a footballer.

All he’s got at South’s is the green light to be make a spectacle of himself and run their club down. Their coach is about to be sacked over it.
 

Mojo

Bench
Messages
4,122
Mmm..I understand and if he joined WT I would return my membership and that of the dog.

But you have the best man manager coach in the game, imho, he’d be capable of getting the filth and wanton violence out of Lats’ game and turning him into a footballer.

All he’s got at South’s is the green light to be make a spectacle of himself and run their club down. Their coach is about to be sacked over it.
Yes, but we have better things to do.
 

HenryTatana

Juniors
Messages
1,974
Gould saying rubbish as usual? Are they carrying any cap for TPG? He is on peanuts playing league in Qld until he eventually runs out for the Broncos.

What Gould does not understand is Lomax asked for the release. When people like Slater or whoever say that clubs release players when it suits them is crap. Saints clearly want Zac and value him highly yet he decided to put in a release, have dinner with a coach from another team and whinge about playing wing. I am sure the Saints would like to have him at the Saints but he just does not want to be there so why should they foot the bill. Like Gallen said, Parra or who ever ends up with him should fit the bill and have to fork out the full amount. Other wise ever team can jag a player for a bargain and get the other team to foot half the bill. How dumb is that. If that is the case Roosters should offer Lomax 400k as Saints will pay the other 450k. I am sure Lomax would rather play at Roosters than the Eels who won't win a comp in a hurry.
Exactly re TPG. Pot, kettle, black. I also remember the TPG release document made into the public domain showing the $0 payout signed by all parties.
 
Messages
17,187
Gus even said he was speaking to Brooks last year, sounding him out “ welfare check” rubbish.

And let’s not talk about his contribution to the SGI review which was an utter and complete failure.
 

justadragon

Bench
Messages
4,103
Just imagine - handing a jersey worn by Langlands to Latrell!
It's bad enough already with the guys who are currently wearing Billy Smith's and Reg Gasnier's jerseys!
Time our guys showed some genuine respect.
Unfortunately Mojo respect in this game left us many years ago, its all about show me the money !!! and even that doesn't work in our case. Our guys need to respect themselves before they even think about anything else.
 

Latest posts

Top