Because it suits your argument.
Subjective. He still played his usual "rocks and diamonds" game and arguably lost the first final for them. He also had very little game time throughout the year. If he was any good, Bennett would have been playing him from the start. Additionally Bennett wouldn't have let him go if he was seen as valuable to the club moving forward.
And yet it's acceptable to have the same or greater expectation on Widdop? Completely unrealistic.
Yes he has deficiencies in his game but you would have to think that if we had creativity in the half, hooker and fullback as well (or at least 1 of those positions) we may see a different level of playmaker. Not to mention creativity in the coaching ranks.
Cant agree with you.
Widdop is MEANT to be a senior player, english international, blah blah blah.
You think JT, Cooper Cronk, and other experienced international players form would drop with an average coach.
I dont.
Its not that widdop is a bad player.
Its just ... as a number 6 he is meant to be creative.
He isnt, not even a little.
F..k.....I hope Benny Hunt can be.
Or its gonna be a long 2018.
Hopefully james graham will become our natural leader.
Widdop can then just play.
Lets see.
Last edited: