What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Where would a second NZ team play?

Perth Red

Post Whore
Messages
65,959
Is it fully roofed ?

if it is is the roof retractable
Yes fully roofed, no not retractable. Great looking stadium. 25k capacity with drop in further 5k seats if needed.

cost $nz 683mill


 

jim_57

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
4,365
All teams should have a majority home stadium where they play at least 8-9 games in my opinion, non-Sydney teams should be even more, 10 at minimum. Wellington & Christchurch could both have their own teams day hopefully.

I wouldn’t mind a South Island team taking 1-2 games to Dunedin with the rest at Christchurch or a Wellington team taking 1-2 to places like Napier or New Plymouth.
 

jim_57

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
4,365
Most of nz lives on the north island

South Island has a fairly small population.

an nrl team solely based in the South Island would struggle imo

if you have to pick one then Wellington and places around it

Most of the North Island lives in & around Auckland. South Island has about 1.1m people, Canterbury region around 650k of that. Wellington has slightly less in the immediate vicinity but more within easy travelling distance from memory. @flippikat would be able to give a better summation I’m sure.
 

MugaB

Coach
Messages
12,155
Seeing lots of people in favour of the NRL admitting a second NZ team. But there seems to be a shortage of detail on any official bids. Is there genuine interest and more specifically where would they play and what would they be called?

Christchurch in the new Te Kaha Stadium is one option if so, would they be called Christchurch? Canterbury? Southern or South Island?

Would Wellington be a good place for an NRL team? Auckland has nearly 2 million people in the city which is more than enough for a second NRL team, how about that?
Hamilton, Waikato, build the derby, then expand to Wellington and Christchurch there after
 

Brian potter

Bench
Messages
4,222
Most of the North Island lives in & around Auckland. South Island has about 1.1m people, Canterbury region around 650k of that. Wellington has slightly less in the immediate vicinity but more within easy travelling distance from memory. @flippikat would be able to give a better summation I’m sure.
According to data the current population of Christchurch is just over 400k and the greater Christchurch area has a projected population of just over 600k by 2030.

this is more than enough to sustain a NRL team imo.
 

SpaceMonkey

Immortal
Messages
38,025
Since V'Landy wants it in the south then Invercargill is clearly the front runner - they'll win every home game as Oz teams wont be able to handle the conditions.
Invercargill is the arsehole of the universe so they’ll probably just forfeit to save going there
 

SpaceMonkey

Immortal
Messages
38,025
Most of the North Island lives in & around Auckland. South Island has about 1.1m people, Canterbury region around 650k of that. Wellington has slightly less in the immediate vicinity but more within easy travelling distance from memory. @flippikat would be able to give a better summation I’m sure.

there’s very little in it.
Wellington functional urban area is 414K, plus 46K next door in the Kapiti Coast (half an hour up the new motorway)
Christchurch functional urban area is 470K.
Wellington would start to pull ahead once you start talking about places within a couple of hours drive, but within 100km or so it’s pretty equal.
 

jim_57

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
4,365
there’s very little in it.
Wellington functional urban area is 414K, plus 46K next door in the Kapiti Coast (half an hour up the new motorway)
Christchurch functional urban area is 470K.
Wellington would start to pull ahead once you start talking about places within a couple of hours drive, but within 100km or so it’s pretty equal.

Thanks, sounds like population won’t be a deciding factor then. Waikato looks like similar numbers too.

Regarding Christchurch do you think a “South Island” branded team could work in a similar manner to North Queensland? Maybe playing a couple games a year in Dunedin and a trial in Nelson. Or would the rest of the South Island just see it as a Canterbury team however you painted it?
 

Gobsmacked

Bench
Messages
2,649
Won’t that be confusing with the west coast pirates having already been admitted to the nrl a few years earlier?
What ever happened to that bid ?
I'd say it won't be used again.
The best bet is to bring back the Reds if anything, a little history and feel good story reinstating an old franchise.
There's a whole country banging at the door of the NRL on the other hand with enough talent for 2 quality international teams capable of beating Australia.
 

SpaceMonkey

Immortal
Messages
38,025
Thanks, sounds like population won’t be a deciding factor then. Waikato looks like similar numbers too.


Waikato itself very similar- 515K in the region and the vast bulk of those within an hour of Hamilton. Plus another 350K in the adjoining Bay of Plenty region a little over an hour away.

Regarding Christchurch do you think a “South Island” branded team could work in a similar manner to North Queensland? Maybe playing a couple games a year in Dunedin and a trial in Nelson. Or would the rest of the South Island just see it as a Canterbury team however you painted it?
Cantabrians are probably the most parochial people in NZ- if it was based primarily in Christchurch you'd probably just brand it as a Christchurch or Canterbury team.
 
Last edited:

flippikat

Bench
Messages
4,467
Waikato itself very similar- 515K in the region and the vast bulk of those within an hour of Hamilton. Plus another 350K in the adjoining Bay of Plenty region a little over an hour away.


Cantabrians are probably the most parochial people in NZ- if it was based primarily in Christchurch you'd probably just brand it as a Christchurch or Canterbury team.
Yeah, that's a big risk for Christchurch-based side, could easily be just a Christchurch-supported side.. plus the Crusaders are a huge presence there, so a tough task carving a niche for an NRL team there.

Problem is the other prime candidate - my city Wellington - just doesn't have a great record of sporting success or active fan engagement. Dunno whether we're too metropolitan/arty, or if it's the "lovable loser" experience that makes us less emotionally invested in our teams or what it is.
 

Wb1234

Referee
Messages
23,074
Yeah, that's a big risk for Christchurch-based side, could easily be just a Christchurch-supported side.. plus the Crusaders are a huge presence there, so a tough task carving a niche for an NRL team there.

Problem is the other prime candidate - my city Wellington - just doesn't have a great record of sporting success or active fan engagement. Dunno whether we're too metropolitan/arty, or if it's the "lovable loser" experience that makes us less emotionally invested in our teams or what it is.
What happened to the hurricanes ? Or whatever the Wellington super rugby side was

do you think the average staidum has played a part
 
Top