What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Round 7 vs Souths

Luke Bowden

First Grade
Messages
6,913
Free world. I know someone who was a victim of a similar crime. I bet you my last dollar, if a loved one of yours, male, or female, was a victim you will be outraged. May got off lightly.

A victim of that crime, under those circumstances, no I wouldn’t be outraged.
Compared to others who have committed the same crime, as a 1st offender, May has received the largest penalty I’ve ever heard of.

Please show me an offender who has received more from the court + his employer + the general public.
 
Messages
21,867
I believe he was given a harsher sentence because he was a rugby league player.

It probably wouldn't have even made the media or the papers without him being a footy player either.

Hard to know if he got a harsher sentence. Leaking sex tapes is relatively a new crime, not much to compare it to. But the reason it’s become an issue is because of the whole revenge porn thing.

But the crime carries a maximum penalty of 2 years in jail, so May wasn’t treat that harshly overall.

https://www.justice.nsw.gov.au/justicepolicy/Documents/distribution-of-intimate-images-without-consent/Legal Aid NSW.pdf


In fact the prosecution wanted a custodial sentence, so I’d say May did okay.

https://www.smh.com.au/sport/nrl/ty...ver-sex-tapes-conviction-20200131-p53wen.html
 
Last edited:

Todd Hoffman

Juniors
Messages
486
I believe he was given a harsher sentence because he was a rugby league player.

It probably wouldn't have even made the media or the papers without him being a footy player either.

The bigger the name the bigger the coverage. Unless you are James Hooper and you mates in the media cover things up.

I was referring to the charges that were dropped when he pleaded guilty to 4 counts of filming without consent.
In a plea deal prosecutors dropped 4 charges of distribution. I am not claiming he is guilty of those charges but he was very lucky they were dropped.

https://www.9news.com.au/national/t...nsw-news/be05b814-3433-41d9-a6b8-3ac6c6f26099
 
Messages
21,867
A victim of that crime, under those circumstances, no I wouldn’t be outraged.
Compared to others who have committed the same crime, as a 1st offender, May has received the largest penalty I’ve ever heard of.

Please show me an offender who has received more from the court + his employer + the general public.

it’s only a new crime, so you won’t be able to find many convictions from it at all.
 

soc123_au

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
18,560
If she didnt know she was being filmed I'm Greg Inglis. She is looking straight at the phone in his hand a foot away from her face as he is ploughing her. I'm not condoning it, but he was stiched up imo.
 
Messages
21,867
If she didnt know she was being filmed I'm Greg Inglis. She is looking straight at the phone in his hand a foot away from her face as he is ploughing her. I'm not condoning it, but he was stiched up imo.


Stitched up?

Anyway I think you’ll find he plead guilty to the lesser offence in order to avoid a trial on the more serious offence of distribution.
 

Aliceinwonderland

First Grade
Messages
7,602
If she didnt know she was being filmed I'm Greg Inglis. She is looking straight at the phone in his hand a foot away from her face as he is ploughing her. I'm not condoning it, but he was stiched up imo.






I thought the same at the time.

(yep I did see snippets of the tapes) so everyone can stop choking on their drinks.

Players (at times) have been stitched up by 'ladies' ever since Adam ate that apple.

Look at Reynolds as a classic example. Pearce was another example. Stewart also.

Now folks back to talking bout Fibroman. Any chance he would come back for a visit ?

That's a far more interesting train of thought than this.........
 

age.s

First Grade
Messages
7,046
I just don't see what May has done to earn it. Burton hasn't done a thing wrong other than be underutilized, while May allowed his own stupidity to scupper a year and a half of his career (not to mention the effect on his teammates). Sure he theoretically covers injury more comprehensively, but this isn't football manager. Giving men what they deserve is important.

He's done his time so I'd have no major issue with him playing, but let's just say on the balance of things he's the kind of guy I'd be fine seeing off to the Gold Coast. What a match that'd be!
 
Messages
21,867
I thought the same at the time.

(yep I did see snippets of the tapes) so everyone can stop choking on their drinks.

Players (at times) have been stitched up by 'ladies' ever since Adam ate that apple.

Look at Reynolds as a classic example. Pearce was another example. Stewart also.

Now folks back to talking bout Fibroman. Any chance he would come back for a visit ?

That's a far more interesting train of thought than this.........


So you have no real evidence of this stitch up, but you also thought May’s actions were wrong, and you’re definitely not making excuses for him. You’re all over the place on this.
 

Aliceinwonderland

First Grade
Messages
7,602
So you have no real evidence of this stitch up, but you also thought May’s actions were wrong, and you’re definitely not making excuses for him. You’re all over the place on this.






Yep Let me explain again.

I thought it was wrong, (i.e something that I wouldn't personally do). The thought of videoing myself having sex would (in my opinion) be pretty gross.

I am speaking as a 63 year old lady not a 20 something male.

Morally it's something I would not do. But in saying that I'm not about to condem others for their actions. (only if permission is gained of the videoing)

Is that understandable.

I believe I'm quite clear in my thought process.
 

Pomoz

Bench
Messages
2,864
I think about how I would have been at that age, with the cash, spare time & women pretty much throwing themselves at you. I used to socialise regularly with a Panthers player in the late 80's early 90's. The things I saw would make your toes curl. I also got a bit of a taste by guilt through association, ie being confused as a player by being out with more recognisable players. Good times I tell you. Lucky there were no mobile phones...........
Hmm, I was living in Castlereagh Street two doors away from a star player and next door to Darren Willis at that time. Darren Willis was a a country boy, a true gentleman with a gorgeous wife and family. Nothing to see here. The star player wasn't a country boy. He was exactly what most young blokes would be like in that position, living it large and having a great time. Nothing truly bad, but with mobile phones he could easily have been painted as a party animal and womaniser.

To say woman threw themselves at him, would not be an exaggeration at all. It is mind boggling to watch and I am not sure that has changed much when it comes to the new generation of superstars out on the town, except that all indiscretions are now captured and posted on social media. Of course there is also now a less tolerant attitude about behaviour towards woman which is a most welcome change from the 80's and 90's and long may it continue.

Just a point of clarification, his social life never seemed to affect the star player on the field, he trained hard and delivered in the big games. He was always a polite respectful bloke in person, but the girls just wouldn't leave him alone. Lucky bugger!!
 
Messages
21,867
Yep Let me explain again.

I thought it was wrong, (i.e something that I wouldn't personally do). The thought of videoing myself having sex would (in my opinion) be pretty gross.

I am speaking as a 63 year old lady not a 20 something male.

Morally it's something I would not do. But in saying that I'm not about to condem others for their actions. (only if permission is gained of the videoing)

Is that understandable.

I believe I'm quite clear in my thought process.


A few posts ago you said you weren’t making excuses for May, then you went on to make two excuses for him directly after that. First you said you think he received a harsher sentence because he’s a RL player, then you said you think it might’ve been a stitch up. These sound very much like excuses.
 

Aliceinwonderland

First Grade
Messages
7,602
A few posts ago you said you weren’t making excuses for May, then you went on to make two excuses for him directly after that. First you said you think he received a harsher sentence because he’s a RL player, then you said you think it might’ve been a stitch up. These sound very much like excuses.



I've explained myself.

I'm not going to pull a part every word said just to make you feel better.

May was found guilty. He did his time. His suspension is over, now allowed to play again.
 

soc123_au

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
18,560
A few posts ago you said you weren’t making excuses for May, then you went on to make two excuses for him directly after that. First you said you think he received a harsher sentence because he’s a RL player, then you said you think it might’ve been a stitch up. These sound very much like excuses.
I was the one who said it was a stitch up. I'm not making excuses for him, he f**ked up for sure. But the time should fit the crime. Like I said, she had to be aware she was filming. I cant prove it. neither could he. I assume thats why he copped the plea deal. Some people are carrying on like he was chief engineer of the holocaust.
 
Top