What's new
By:
Advanced search…
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Search results

  1. antonius

    Today's Tactics

    No they have all been average. Your best mate Cross has been no better than any of them. Your turn
  2. antonius

    Today's Tactics

    Pika, I'm not blaming Cross, I'm blaming Smith full stop. I said Cross was ordinary and Shane took exception to that, and that's fine too, we're all entitled to an opinion.
  3. antonius

    Today's Tactics

    That's right I did say that, and I stick by it. You asked who our best forward was in attack and I answered that. Whats with all the capitals?? you angry or something? Injuries aside Cross came here talking himself up as the next Harragon, or Butterfield. So far in the games he's played he's...
  4. antonius

    Today's Tactics

    LOL. Your not going to drag me into any more argument, you asked the question I answered it. Paterson is one of the best attacking forwards we have.
  5. antonius

    Today's Tactics

    You forgot to mention his try, (an honest oversight I'm sure) and what have tackle counts got to do with attacking stats? (you did ask about attack I think)
  6. antonius

    Today's Tactics

    That's right stats don't show the true picture. You asked "best forward in attack" I thought Pato was dangerous in attack consistantly throughout the game.
  7. antonius

    Today's Tactics

    See the next weeks team thread.
  8. antonius

    Today's Tactics

    Hard to comment on his "usual" form because I've hardly seen him this year. In attack Pato.
  9. antonius

    Pumped-up Cross ready to pack punch Prop primed for final charge at semi berth

    You are spot on with those comments, Smith out thinks himself, and always has.
  10. antonius

    Today's Tactics

    How is that a contradiction??? Taufua was out because his wife was expecting the birth of their baby, someone would have to replace him logically that would've been Cross.
  11. antonius

    Today's Tactics

    No, ordinary means he wasn't anything special. My comments on Wicks is bagging.
  12. antonius

    Today's Tactics

    Oh yeh, the dumping of White was a disgrace
  13. antonius

    Today's Tactics

    Get over it I am not bagging Cross, I am bagging Smiths selections today including Royal, Wicks, and Karawana how he came into the equation in the first place is a mystery only Brian Smith knows the answer to. The side didn't need to be changed, maybe Cross for Taufua that's it.
  14. antonius

    Today's Tactics

    Again down to Smith. He brought back three forwards from injury, one of which is flat out playing 20 mins and none of that is any quality (Guess who?) so someone has to take up the slack, and that's hard when you're out for so long.
  15. antonius

    Today's Tactics

    I'm being unfair it was prob down to Wicks, who left Cross posted.
  16. antonius

    Today's Tactics

    Please yourself. Doesn't show the tackle he missed that led to a try.
  17. antonius

    Today's Tactics

    Think what you like JM, I have no agenda with Cross. I hope he produces all he's promised for the Knights, I really do.
  18. antonius

    Knights vs Raiders - Match Talk

    Sorry :oops:
  19. antonius

    Today's Tactics

    No Cross hate here. IMO he was ordinary it's not always about stats. Saying that he was the only one of Smiths forward replacements that I'd keep for next week.
  20. antonius

    Knights vs Raiders - Match Talk

Latest posts

Top