- Messages
- 20,228
greeneyed said:insane..... It happens week after week. Read any column by Phil Gould.... Read any statement from Dennis Fitzgerald.... I mean, do you have your head in the sand?
LOL, the Artless Dodger...
greeneyed said:insane..... It happens week after week. Read any column by Phil Gould.... Read any statement from Dennis Fitzgerald.... I mean, do you have your head in the sand?
Southernsaint said:greeneyed said:insane..... It happens week after week. Read any column by Phil Gould.... Read any statement from Dennis Fitzgerald.... I mean, do you have your head in the sand?
LOL, the Artless Dodger...
innsaneink said:Youve given me Phil Gould, who happens to be one of the highest profile league figures in the country, who is on National TV and has a newspaper column, and Fitzy who occasionally comes out with a laugh for everyone.
Its not a moot point, as you have no point, if you had said ........."over and over the Roosters & Gould and occasionally parra think that they should control what should happen in a national rugby league competition"............then maybe you would have a point.
As I said, you generalise.
I knew you would bring up the 16 team point, and on WestsTigers CEO publicly stating his opposition to another team, he is duty bound by Wests and Balmain supporters along with WestsTigers supporters who were assured by the NRL that there would be no more teams IF they merged.
As we all know, we were stabbed in the back.
As for you argument, its hardly WestsTigers telling the NRL what they should do, rather than making their stance public.
Called looking after your own backyard.
greeneyed said:Ahhhhhhh........ now I see why you are so sensitive .....
dimitri said:this topic has gone totally of course
but i think we can all agree
that super league f***ed up expansion (GC, PERTH, ADELAIDE, etc)
f***ed up international league
so what on earth was it that super league was supposed to bring us ?????
Daithi O'Conaill said:I've always regarded Raiders fans as some of the lowest forms of Rugby League life.
Lime Green Scumbags supportive of their clubs Super League stance despite being virtually the only pro-Murdoch club not to have gained from their treachery.
So what does this mean? That the scumbags measure the success of their support for SL on the pain they inflicted on other clubs.
A cancer on the game.
westie said:I am trendy, you are not.
innsaneink said:greeneyed said:Ahhhhhhh........ now I see why you are so sensitive .....
Checkmate.
greeneyed said:No, the ARL insisted that those expansion clubs be closed down as part of the "settlement", so as to protect the Sydney clubs.
greeneyed said:No, the ARL insisted that those expansion clubs be closed down as part of the "settlement", so as to protect the Sydney clubs.
Front-Rower said:greeneyed said:No, the ARL insisted that those expansion clubs be closed down as part of the "settlement", so as to protect the Sydney clubs.
Yes, so they could protect the 90 years of tradition at the time, and not have the blow ins like your club and the other "expansion" clubs who stabbed the ARL in the back in order for a quick buck, ruin the game.
If you do some research, you will find that not one foundation club, the clubs which provided the competition and the game in the first place ALL stayed loyal. The teams the ARL/NSWRL invited into its competition were the ones who destoryed any chance the game had of going semi-national.
And if you do some more research you can find out some more interesting points on why Super League was started and why it was doomed from a marketing perspective from day one, especially with club logos.
http://www.google.com.au