What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

'15 | R5 | Fri 4pm | CBY 17-18 SOU | ANZ

Round 5: Bulldogs v Rabbitohs

  • Draw after Golden Point

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    16
  • Poll closed .
Messages
17,565
The Dogs halves are the least creative halves in the NRL,had plenty of chances to win the game,hope big nose goes nowhere near them at origin time.
But souths glorious run with the refs was taken to a new level today,finished off with the cherry on top by letting Millard push Morris over who was going for the ball on the short kick off,Dogs should of had a kick to win the game.

:lol: seriously?

Barba/Robson
Graham/Robson

Rest my case
 

The Colonel

Immortal
Messages
41,992
I hope you're right, but I imagine trained medical staff can tell the nature of an injury pretty easily.

Trained medical staff can assess damage but they still have to view x-Rays and mri's to see the full picture..... I'm not doubting he is injured and they have a handle on that but most specialists make the call on length of time an injury will take to heal.
 

typicalfan

Coach
Messages
15,488
Says precedence.

Unless you have that link I originally asked for where all taking out of the legs are reportable offences?

Burden of proof is on you I'm afraid.

It very obviously is reportable for me if the video ref or ref deems it worthy.
 

lockyno1

Post Whore
Messages
53,350
Karma I'm sure will get Graham in the end. Such a shame that Reynolds is injured. These are the types of actions that can be stopped
 

BunniesMan

Immortal
Messages
33,738
I don't disagree with any of this but a bloke playing his guts out trying to win a game for his team who accidentally gets it all wrong doesn't make him a scumbag.

Coming 'across' the kicker isn't always possible or ideal. Graham went hard and was penalised for it. I don't disagree with the ruling but the precedent has been set and I do think its harsh that a game can be decided by such a ruling.

I didn't call him a scumbag and don't think he is one. I can totally understand his frustration and feel for him. Better team lost today.
 

rabbitohs95

Bench
Messages
4,711
With the loss of Reynolds I would have rather we lost that game and he not get injured. F*ck me James Graham is a pleb. I know he was trying to get his team the result but he just injured our most important player ughhhh
 

LazyDreamer

Bench
Messages
4,934
The refs gifted Souffs the game as best they could, but at least Reynolds was injured, so not a total waste.
 

RWB

Bench
Messages
2,814
Burden of proof is on you I'm afraid.

It very obviously is reportable for me if the video ref or ref deems it worthy.

If you're claiming there's a rule or guideline that states all attacking of the legs is a reportable offence exists then the burden of proof is on you.

I'm denying its existence, not sure you understand how burden of proof works...
 

typicalfan

Coach
Messages
15,488
If you're claiming there's a rule or guideline that states all attacking of the legs is a reportable offence exists then the burden of proof is on you.

I'm denying its existence, not sure you understand how burden of proof works...
No you are the one saying it is a non reportable offense, you made that statement multiple times.

There is nothing anywhere that states players who attack the legs are not to be suspended or reported on. Which means if the video ref deems it worthy he is well within his rights. And remember it WAS put on report.
 
Top