Jason Maher
Immortal
- Messages
- 35,991
Get over it you f**king sook Gamebreaker. The incident was a clear penalty.
The Dogs halves are the least creative halves in the NRL,had plenty of chances to win the game,hope big nose goes nowhere near them at origin time.
But souths glorious run with the refs was taken to a new level today,finished off with the cherry on top by letting Millard push Morris over who was going for the ball on the short kick off,Dogs should of had a kick to win the game.
I hope you're right, but I imagine trained medical staff can tell the nature of an injury pretty easily.
Says precedence.
Unless you have that link I originally asked for where all taking out of the legs are reportable offences?
I don't disagree with any of this but a bloke playing his guts out trying to win a game for his team who accidentally gets it all wrong doesn't make him a scumbag.
Coming 'across' the kicker isn't always possible or ideal. Graham went hard and was penalised for it. I don't disagree with the ruling but the precedent has been set and I do think its harsh that a game can be decided by such a ruling.
Get over it you f**king sook Gamebreaker. The incident was a clear penalty.
He was put on report wasn't he ?
What criteria determines what is repeatable??
Burden of proof is on you I'm afraid.
It very obviously is reportable for me if the video ref or ref deems it worthy.
No you are the one saying it is a non reportable offense, you made that statement multiple times.If you're claiming there's a rule or guideline that states all attacking of the legs is a reportable offence exists then the burden of proof is on you.
I'm denying its existence, not sure you understand how burden of proof works...
Dogs fans bitching about a correct match deciding penalty. Well I never...
This coming from a dragons fan.
Pot meet kettle. ;-)
Great argument