GongPanther
Referee
- Messages
- 28,676
duplicate posting
Last edited:
I don't doubt that. I do doubt that a diagnosis can be made within an hour of the game finishing....
Sportsbet have refunded all H2H and 1-12 margin bets on the Dogs :lol:
Sportsbet have refunded all H2H and 1-12 margin bets on the Dogs :lol:
No you are the one saying it is a non reportable offense, you made that statement multiple times.
http://www.foxsports.com.au/nrl/ada...in-over-bulldogs/story-e6frf3ou-1227290589773
Massive news and a huge blow to Souths' back to back hopes.
next minute...Klemmer is really maturing. It's great to see a big fella realise that he is bigger and stronger than most players.
Argument? It's a statement of fact. Graham took out Reynolds legs. That is a penalty. Correct call was made. Where is the problem?
The video ref chiming in and awarding the penalty is the problem
The same reason the video ref doesn't award penalties whenever contact in made with the head
Your such a biased tool Anish you really make yourself sound stupid.You know that blood flows right? Blood being on his face does not actually mean he was cut there.
The blood flowed around his ear and onto his right cheek. Morris's foot was at best within a couple inches of the left side of Luke's face
Rugby League is turning into a shit game. Handbags at ten paces when players are upset and now this crap. Crowds are down cause the game is crap these days
Rugby League is now officially a game for pussies
Your such a biased tool Anish you really make yourself sound stupid.
FMD.
How hard is it to understand that the on field ref asked the video ref to review the incident? The video ref didnt "chime in" as you put it, they were asked for their opinion and gave it.
That's not the point I'm making
You think a blanket "any contact after a charge down" is worth a penalty from the video ref, they're not
They should be treated like the way video ref look at high tackles.
If the on field ref saw it, then its a penalty - fair enough, but he didn't so bad luck.
Build a bridge dikhed...your in denial...glory gloryThe video ref chiming in and awarding the penalty is the problem
The same reason the video ref doesn't award penalties whenever contact in made with the head
Suck it up princess:lol:That's not the point I'm making
You think a blanket "any contact after a charge down" is worth a penalty from the video ref, they're not
They should be treated like the way video ref look at high tackles.
If the on field ref saw it, then its a penalty - fair enough, but he didn't so bad luck.
But that's NOT how they treat high tackles. I really don't understand your argument.