I used those two teams as examples as famous brands in sport, and yes the analogy works because THEY regard the NRL as the top tier competition in rugby league, as do other sport lovers regard the EPL or NBA the top tier in their respective leagues.. most would think the hunters are the A-league in comparison... if crowds was an metric the arlc cared about redcliffe wouldn't be playing at kayo stadium, nor sharks at theirs, PNG or Pasifika has alway been a bid they've wanted to get player pathways formed and also the govt funding it, is a massive bonus to not have to worry about 1/18th of the broadcaster money, which they most likely use to purchase more assets or handout to the other 17 clubs.. dont be a dunce, if you think this team is on a level playing field with any other bid, think again, greed from the clubs, greed by the game, and boosting the player pool is all they all care about in regards to expansion, unless every bid agrees to refuse any broadcaster money to run its 1st grade side, this bid wins purely on its decade of govt funding... not coz of crowd size