When their fumbleball colleagues bring up Adelaide and Perth they should say "Auckland and Port Moresby".
Top 10 population centres in Aus & NZ:
1. Sydney RL dominant over AFL
2. Melbourne AFL dominant over RL
3. Brisbane RL dominant over AFL
4. Auckland RL dominant over AFL
5. Perth AFL dominant over RL
6. Adelaide AFL dominant over RL
7. Gold Coast RL dominant over AFL
8. Newcastle RL dominant over AFL
9. Canberra RL dominant over AFL
10. Central Coast RL dominant over AFL
That's 7 out of 10 of the largest population areas in favour of RL. Are we seeing the big picture now why the AFL are desperately pissing hundreds of millions down the drain to get a tiny foothold in our markets? NSW and QLD aren't a battleground, they are THE battleground in Australian sports. Whoever wins them long term dominates.
The AFL aren't "geniuses" for expanding here, they had no choice but to risk spending ridiculous sums to get foreign markets to accept their shit sport. The NRL don't have to do that at all. QLD's population is larger than WA, SA and TAS combined. Let that sink in for a second and tell me if we need to go putting irrelevant dots on a map. We don't, we just need to leverage our heartlands and geographical advantage properly.
Now having said that, I'm in favour of a Perth team in the NRL but let's not overstate the importance of getting some of the AFL's wasteland heartlands because they are largely irrelevant when it comes to winning the code battle.