Those same people also want ch9 to run the game and make all the important decisions.
Nobody says that.
Those same people also want ch9 to run the game and make all the important decisions.
Prime bought the rights to Australian swimming. It's not high profile, but it's local.You think ch7 can afford the rights after getting cricket and AFL?
Amazon Prime has yet to show a want in taking on local sports. Particularly one that has a high cost and high rights price.
Channel 10 won't bid alone.
That leaves you with
10/Paramount
Fox/9
Stan/9
As the only options.
10 has Regional FTA issues.
Not sure Stan will go very high when they can partner up with fox and get the best of the NRL and pay $150m as opposed to $700 or so you'd need for it all
Strawman.Those same people also want ch9 to run the game and make all the important decisions.
I cannot see Perth getting in unless NZ doesn't put in a bid.Not entirely.
Ch10 had the issue with their regional FTA network.
Paramount plus is a dread ful service in the Regions.
They be left expanding to Tas with no guarantee those down there would get a reception
Same issues would be a concern for NRL with regional QLD and most of WA. Should Perth come in.
Ch9/STAN need it more than Foxtel.They’ve said they are bidding for the lot
can’t see them outbidding fox
Prime bought the rights to Australian swimming. It's not high profile, but it's local.
Add costs of commentators and other talking heads would be massiveIt is produced externally by Australian Swimming. Literally all Prime are doing is broadcasting the feed.
Similarly to how the ICC tournaments will work.
An NRL round costs around $1m to produce. Likely higher because they can't use the producers/commentators etc in other programming to save costs
Add costs of commentators and other talking heads would be massive
Nobody says that.
It is produced externally by Australian Swimming. Literally all Prime are doing is broadcasting the feed.
Similarly to how the ICC tournaments will work.
An NRL round costs around $1m to produce. Likely higher because they can't use the producers/commentators etc in other programming to save costs
Actually your donkey account and wb1234 regularly say that ch9 should be given whatever they ask for. That'd mean they run the game.
Buying the rights to Thursday night football, premier league games and Ligue 1 in France would suggest they are interested in expensive sports broadcasting.
..do what nine want in regard to bris3. Doing everything nine want is something else altogether.. But keep misrepresenting what ppl are saying.
NFL is only Thursday night. While they do produce the content. They are doing so with a target of 12m people a week.
Strawman.Actually your donkey account and wb1234 regularly say that ch9 should be given whatever they ask for. That'd mean they run the game.
Ah they said that we should give the broadcasters everything they want, otherwise they will give bad publicity. Keep trying to backtrack for them, it's not working.
It’s funny people ignoring quotes from nein and fox about wanting another brisbane team because it doesn’t suit their narrativeStrawman.
I say Ch9 will pay more for Brisbane 3 than Perth because the former will allow them to recoup more money through advertising.
@Perth Red misrepresents Ch9's position on the Dolphins. They didn't provide extra revenue because they lost access to four Broncos games and the rights weren't put on the open market. No team comes close to drawing as many viewers on FTA across the country as the Broncos.
If you think a Perth-based team will be as relevant around the country as the Storm then you're deluded.
Not even the West Coast Eagles can compete with the big Melbourne clubs for national relevance. It's foolish to think a Perth-based NRL team will draw anything but low ratings in Brisbane and Sydney. Perth is not Melbourne. The dynamics in SEQ and Sydney in 2023 are different to when the Storm entered in 1998. Perth will be another Titans.
It’s funny people ignoring quotes from nein and fox about wanting another brisbane team because it doesn’t suit their narrative
Who gives a f**k what nine and fox want, you guys circle jerk over the broadcasters, when its the clubs who retain the only votes that matter, sucking up to broadcasters gets you nowhere, and offending them does to, just better to leak the news on your preferred bid out early and keep talking about that, ala png or dolphins, the media always jumps on board eventually anywaysIt's funny people saying we should give ch9 exactly what they want and then backtracking and pretending that they didn't say that.
You are furiously in agreement with each otherWho gives a f**k what nine and fox want, you guys circle jerk over the broadcasters, when its the clubs who retain the only votes that matter, sucking up to broadcasters gets you nowhere, and offending them does to, just better to leak the news on your preferred bid out early and keep talking about that, ala png or dolphins, the media always jumps on board eventually anyways
Who gives a f**k what nine and fox want