There is a bit to unpack there.
1. That depends on a lot of things. It depends on Channel Nine retaining the rights and it also depends on what framework they have if they retain the rights. If it is the same arrangement as it is now, they probably won’t be paying much more than they are now; even more so if there is no competitive tension. They have shown no inclination to pay more regardless of who is in the competition.
2. Why would Foxtel care who hosts the 6pm game? That is the same thing as somebody saying that they need Perth to host the Sunday 6pm game (which by the way you have rejected as unimportant). They’ll want those time slots for whomever is in the competition. The argument is that it is better for the clubs to not have to host those games because it impacts on their attendances.
A couple of additional things on this: how does a Kiwi side help Australian advertisers and secondly what are the current ratings for the Warriors on PayTV. Those things are more important.
Lastly, being two hours ahead of the east coast doesn’t really help with ratings in NZ either.
An additional Kiwi side would have massive benefits for the competition (take on RU, build the sport in NZ and development of players etc) but I struggle to see how it would be a TV decision
3. Corporates and sponsorship is more than just corporate facilities at a ground.
Calm down, nobody watches NRL in Perth. Nine said they wanted more se Qld teams & fox footed bill for Redcliffe expansion. Nobody in tv has indicated they want Perth..