Of course there isn’t. You couldnt possibly guarantee anything,
What we can guarantee is without it RL won’t grow its participation in those states. So the question is does the arlc want to meet its mandate and grow the game around the country?
And if yes then is it willing to invest to do so?
And if the answer is no then you have to question if they are the right people to be running the game.
because there is a clear correlation between sport investment and participation Increase.
maybe, but there is an argument that with all the ample opportunities already in place for kids to play RL in those cities it’s already near saturatioN where as in other cities it isn’t even close.
So investing an extra $3m in Brisbane won't lead to more people playing the game, but Adelaide, Melbourne and Perth will provide 30k players for $9m?
What are you basing this figure on?
What is the $9m going to be spent on?
How will it create an additional 30k players?
You can hire all the development officers in the world and purchase more land for new clubs, but it won't make any difference in participation unless you can convince people who aren't currently playing the game to sign up for a club.
Do you have any evidence that there's 30k people in Adelaide, Melbourne and Perth willing to play the game on the condition that $9m is thrown at development officers and a new change room for the Joondalup Giants and Altona Roosters?
What's stopping these people from signing up now?
There are clubs throughout Queensland and NSW that operate on the back of volunteers and fund raising events. I don't see them whinging about how they would have more players if they had more money.