TBH think that it's just that the Border legacy was established before Warne's - Waugh's up there for mine, but Warne thinks he's superior
Quite possibly.
Warne is more of a superstar than S Waugh. The great Australian team could both handle Warne being banned with MacGill, just as it carried on under Punter for a years post Steve Waugh. Neither were individually bigger than the great team unlike arguably Bradman playing for a trial team against the then national team.
Warne will always be the bigger superstar than Waugh, rightly or wrongly, just as he is over Murali, rightly or wrongly.
Warne's legacy is in line with Tendulkar's, it does not matter whether McGrath, Murali, Donald, Younis or Akram were better bowlers or not. Just as it does not matter if Sangakarra, Lara, S Waugh, R Ponting, Kallis and Dravid were better batsman than Tendulkar or not.
Warne and Tendulkar have achieved super stardom in the modern era that no cricketer, bar the Don, has achieved previously.
Someone should tell Warne that he does not need to bring up ugly old war stories that can only hinder his legacy's image, not improve upon it.