Babyface O'reilly
Coach
- Messages
- 12,516
For all their weirdness, there are still some Superleague jerseys that are OK.
Refer to designs here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1997_Super_League_%28Australia%29_season
* The Perth jersey was not too bad, a little bit better than the 1995 "panels" jersey, which was a bit busy - interestingly, the current Reds jersey is closer to the SL jersey than the 1995 jersey.
* I like the Cowboys jersey with the striped V - it's a straightforward design, and it's a damn lot better than some of the art projects they've been wearing recently.
* The Sharks design was not too bad (same template as the Reds, but it looked ok). Although my favourite sharks jerseys were the ones with fin designs that they wore after SL.
But there were soome shockers too.
* The Broncos/Raiders template was just plain weird.
A star-burst? arrows pointing to the groin? Were the designers on crack??
* The Mariners/Rams template was silly too.. the same v-design on back AND front? WRONG!
But I had a particular hate for the Warriors/Panthers template - psychedelic spaghetti.
The only other first grade jersey I've seen like that was the Tigers from a few years ago.
Why don't designers understand that "less is more"?
Nah, they all sucked. They fact that a couple of clubs shared a template just with different colours, shows that those merkins had no idea about fan culture IMO.
Looking at those templates, they showed Penrith in Brown, black and white. I thought they took the Liquorice All-sorts colours with them to SL but in that dicky SL design. Yes?