I think you're right. Feltis has been pulling the strings there for a while now, even before he was chairman. That's how he got Walsh to "stand down" by campaigning and getting him the votes at the NSWRL so Feltis could then assume the chair unopposed. That's been kept on the quiet for some time now, but I'm sick of it.but Feltis going would be real change.
DOesnt matter where he is on the ballot as long as you tick him and eight others.Just make sure that Nads is one of the other eight.
Nadim has a red hot chance but I don't think Nigel has a hope
The board needs business acumen, not a baker.
It's a shame there weren't more candidates as change is needed.
I thought a serious rebel ticket was coming after what Lew had to say earlier in the year.
Nadim has a red hot chance but I don't think Nigel has a hope
The board needs business acumen, not a baker.
It's a shame there weren't more candidates as change is needed.
I thought a serious rebel ticket was coming after what Lew had to say earlier in the year.
Could be but the rule has been in place since long before this election I think.Another thing noted while there
You can sign up for membership today and pay full voting rights.But you can not actually vote untill your membership is granted by the board.Now the board is slated to meet this wednesday there by clearing all new members.
But if they where not to meet .I wonder how many would be affected.There would be about 2 months of members to be cleared .Most new members may be voting nadim and nigel
why does being a baker make you any less of a leader .
Nads tells us he is targeting Feltis and Lowe.
Nigel is targeting Robinson and Lowe.
I am with Nads. Can't really understand what happened there, why they did not coordinate this but Feltis going would be real change.