2011 Memberships

[BunniesMan]

If they sell more where will they sit if they keep playing in their glorified rubbish dumb otherwise known as Kogarah?

Well like Souths they don't have 20k ticketed. I think their ticketed number is around 14-15k. And a large portion of those are only for 1 stadium. So they still have room to grow before they have to either look at jacking up the prices and making a waiting list, Green Bay Packers style, or making significant upgrades to their stadiums.

 

[dangerousdave]

So the club sells bumper stickers and they call that memberships.

No Freebies like Souths and no $29 memberships like Easts...Non ticketed memberships (which are the vast minority) start at $77 for adults

 

[RWB]

No Freebies like Souths and no $29 memberships like Easts...Non ticketed memberships (which are the vast minority) start at $77 for adults

Right here...

SCG trust membership cost me over a grand this year bought my annual jersey + plenty of other junk. But please tell me how I and all the other SCG trust members who decided to conform and be part of the dick measuring contest are lesser members than you?

At least now with this $29 membership I can consider myself a 'real member' :lol:

 

[BunniesMan]

No Freebies like Souths and no $29 memberships like Easts...Non ticketed memberships (which are the vast minority) start at $77 for adults

Why bother opening your mouth when you're so ignorant? Every single one of our memberships that make up our total are completely and totally fully paid up. Manly were giving away free memberships at one point this offseason. We never have. Fail attempt at trolling is just fail.

 

[juro]

Why bother opening your mouth when you're so ignorant? Every single one of our memberships that make up our total are completely and totally fully paid up. Manly were giving away free memberships at one point this offseason. We never have. Fail attempt at trolling is just fail.

Yeah, but when Crowe is the one who is paying for them, it's a bit of a moot point... :roll:

 

[applesauce]

Yeah, but when Crowe is the one who is paying for them, it's a bit of a moot point... :roll:

That's like saying the Knights don't have sponsors because Tinkler makes up the difference. :roll:

 

[BunniesMan]

Yeah, but when Crowe is the one who is paying for them, it's a bit of a moot point... :roll:

Proof or gtfo? Oh wait you don't have any proof...so you know what to do.

 

[juro]

Proof or gtfo? Oh wait you don't have any proof...so you know what to do.

I suppose Sam Burgess' dad paid for his own membership then...

 

[ccr]

I suppose Sam Burgess' dad paid for his own membership then...

Playing in the NRL was always a dream for Sam, and the poor bugger has lost his dad at a young age. Russell bought a membership for sams dad as a positive emotional gesture for Sam playing in the NRL. Russell and Sam (and sams family) are pretty close. Being critical of this is pretty low, considering it was a nice thing to do for someone especially when clubs treat players like cattle most of the time.

 

[juro]

Playing in the NRL was always a dream for Sam, and the poor bugger has lost his dad at a young age. Russell bought a membership for sams dad as a positive emotional gesture for Sam playing in the NRL. Russell and Sam (and sams family) are pretty close. Being critical of this is pretty low, considering it was a nice thing to do for someone especially when clubs treat players like cattle most of the time.

Whether or not it is a nice thing for Crowe to do is beside the point. I am providing proof of one time where he has paid for someone else's membership, since BunniesMan requested I do so. Maybe BunniesMan can now provide proof that Crowe has not paid for any of the current Souths memberships...

 

[BunniesMan]

Before I deal with this idiot below me I have an ontopic question to ask. I recall someone saying the membership "race" officially ends on May 1. Is that true? And if it is when will the NRL release the final totals?

I suppose Sam Burgess' dad paid for his own membership then...

Whether or not it is a nice thing for Crowe to do is beside the point. I am providing proof of one time where he has paid for someone else's membership, since BunniesMan requested I do so. Maybe BunniesMan can now provide proof that Crowe has not paid for any of the current Souths memberships...

It's not my job to prove a negative. You're making an accusation, you prove it.

How about I call you a murderer. Now you prove to me beyond any doubt that you have never murdered anyone in your entire life.

See how ridiculous that is? You don't make accusations and then expect another party to spend time proving that's not true. Prove it yourself or if you can't don't make the accusation.

And even if that one membership wasn't paid (and there's no proof it wasn't) that was a one off. Obviously not what I meant, Manly gave away hundreds. We may or may not have given away 1.

As of now we have 20,384. If it really makes you feel better, we'll count it as 20,383. Idiot.

 

[cleary89]

Well he did prove it....

 

[juro]

Before I deal with this idiot below me I have an ontopic question to ask. I recall someone saying the membership "race" officially ends on May 1. Is that true? And if it is when will the NRL release the final totals?



It's not my job to prove a negative. You're making an accusation, you prove it.

How about I call you a murderer. Now you prove to me beyond any doubt that you have never murdered anyone in your entire life.

See how ridiculous that is? You don't make accusations and then expect another party to spend time proving that's not true. Prove it yourself or if you can't don't make the accusation.

And even if that one membership wasn't paid (and there's no proof it wasn't) that was a one off. Obviously not what I meant, Manly gave away hundreds. We may or may not have given away 1.

As of now we have 20,384. If it really makes you feel better, we'll count it as 20,383. Idiot.

Mate, don't get your knickers in a knot. You asked for proof. I provided it. Don't you think it is unreasonable for you to provide proof of your assertions?

 

[BunniesMan]

Mate, don't get your knickers in a knot. You asked for proof. I provided it. Don't you think it is unreasonable for you to provide proof of your assertions?

What bloody proof? Making an accusation is not the same as providing any sort of proof whatsoever.

And again, even if you are right (and there is 0 proof you are), that's a 1 off. 1 membership. 1 out of over 20 thousand. fmd, you are stupid.

 

[juro]

Mate, there were articles in the papers about it. How much more bloody proof do you want?

And you said all the tickets were paid for by the members. I have shown one example where it obviously wasn't. Who is to know how many others there may have been paid by Crowe? Only a select few would know the answer, and I bet you aren't one of them.

 

[BunniesMan]

Mate, there were articles in the papers about it. How much more bloody proof do you want?

And you said all the tickets were paid for by the members. I have shown one example where it obviously wasn't. Who is to know how many others there may have been paid by Crowe? Only a select few would know the answer, and I bet you aren't one of them.

We're done here. You can't have a rational discussion with an irrational person. I won't be replying to your posts on this topic anymore.

 

[BDGS]

clubs treat players like cattle most of the time.

Long time no see Sonny Bill Williams.

 

[juro]

We're done here. You can't have a rational discussion with an irrational person. I won't be replying to your posts on this topic anymore.

My thoughts exactly!

 

[dollyhands]

We're done here. You can't have a rational discussion with an irrational person. I won't be replying to your posts on this topic anymore.

Hahaha, you got owned so you call him irrational so you can stop him owning you, but really you just become more owned:lol: OWNED Bunniesfag:lol:

 

[BunniesMan]

Hahaha, you got owned so you call him irrational so you can stop him owning you, but really you just become more owned:lol: OWNED Bunniesfag:lol:

Hello troll, as dumb as juro is at least he isn't a troll (I think) like you are. I didn't get owned in any way at all. A 1 off honorary membership that may or may not have been given for free is not the same thing as what Manly did, or what was suggested we did in the first place.

And like I said, if it makes you morons happy, count our total as 20,383 instead of 20,384. But to say because 1 membership may or may not have been given away in a one off honorary case, that we then have mass freebies all over the place, that is the height of irrationality. It's like saying we've defeated terrorism because we killed 1 terrorist guy yesterday.