Doesn't matter the last year was the first time. It goes against _Johnsy's argument that the Qld Reds are struggling for an identity.
They also had more members than the Broncos and have 15,000 members signed up for next year. They are not ripping off the Dragons.
Just done some investigationing... unlikely that's it tbh.
Main reason being that Telstra haven't finalised naming rights.
Could this be it? Found it on the internet but don't know how accurate the information is.
Whilst you could be right, those Dragons mock-ups also have the Telstra Premiership badge.
Looks legit to me. Warriors design came out on that weird template last year. The square V good but thats the only positive, the V should continue on the sleeves and not be broken up by piping. CCC just can't stop wrecking designs with their dumb templates.
No. It gives the impression that the radio presenter was an idiot. You are drawing a very long bow to even consider that the Reds would be ripping off the Dragons. Maybe in Kogarah that would work but what is there to gain in Queensland?I clearly stated that the use of the St.George reds on radio irks me and does give the impression they are using one of the most recognised rugby league brands in the world to their advantage. I didn't think it was much of a strecth, you obviously do. No biggie, feel free to move on.
So, any thoughts on my design, haha.Idea I had for the Roosters. Bit arguable without the V but here it is. Many clubs with multiple colours - one primary and different secondaries, can use this design.
At the moment Parramatta are promoting their 2013 jerseys with no NRL or Telstra badge at all.