Bazal
Post Whore
- Messages
- 103,046
Maybe you should go and top up the hot water and put on some whale songs. I think we'll need a few more from the tail here.
Are you calling his missus a whale? Uncool
Maybe you should go and top up the hot water and put on some whale songs. I think we'll need a few more from the tail here.
Seriously.....if there's only going to be 1 over.....why not bowl Cummins? Happy to be wrong.
Personally I'm not upset that the single over went to the best pace bowler in the world at the moment.
I wouldn't be upset had it gone to Cummins either, but Hazelwood is comfortably our best quick so fair enough IMO.
I think Lyon has been pretty good thus far.
Haha.Basil Brush, you are kidding yourself!
Whether or not anyone watches any cricket at all, the numbers on the SOK vs Lyon thing speak for themselves. SOK has a better FC record, and, unsurprisingly, a better test record. In both formats SOK is more economical, has a better strike rate, and gets more wickets per game.
You say Lyon hasn't played much FC cricket? He was played 46 non-test FC games, SOK has 62. There really isn't much of a difference.
The aim of the game as a bowler is, ultimately, to take wickets. SOK gets more of them, faster, at a cheaper rate than Lyon. That's the story. You can't write it any other way.
I spoke to this bloke years ago who was convinced that Neil Harvey was a better batsman than Don Bradman. Was it you Basil Brush????
Haha.
Look at Lyons record in real cricket i.e. test cricket and come back to me.
Lyon is a far better bowler than O'Keeffe.
Lyon's biggest issue is his ball speed.Once he stopped bowling around the wicket, he got some wickets. What a magical coincidence....
Of course, it makes it all the more mind boggling that he's currently gone back around the wicket.
Lyon's biggest issue is his ball speed.
When around 80-85 kph, he is unbelievable.
However a lot of cricket fans in aus don't rate him for some reason.