TruSaint
Referee
- Messages
- 20,491
![]()
Funny, it doesn't look the Melbourne Storm. But it must be.
Is that Cam Smith ?
![]()
Funny, it doesn't look the Melbourne Storm. But it must be.
Maybe they just like the St George Illawarra Dragons?
Or the colours
Or a player
Or their family follows the club
Or they go to school in the area and had a player visit
Or they like Dragons
Or their old Pop took them to a game
Or they had a family member play there in years gone past
Or a school mate plays there
Why must it be limited to a jersey or where they play ? Do you follow St Helens? Similar Red V.
Every supporter/consumer/customer/fan will give you a different reason.
You have just come across as an arrogant dick.
Most of these do not represent an "emotional investment". All you've listed are "catalysts". For example.. when Kriss Kross emerged in the early 90's they were the catalyst for people wearing their pants backwards. The fad quickly passed though. Because there was no depth.
The only one with any real emotional connection is Pop taking them to a game. But when Pop is considered an irrelevant or "dead" demographic, that one seems to be at risk.
Interesting. So how do the 15 clubs without a Red V survive? Seems impossible by your logic...
:shock::shock:Interesting. So how do the 15 clubs without a Red V survive? Seems impossible by your logic...
Interesting how certain posters on here don't like to have their POV challenged, and when you do you're dismissed as being "arrogant" or "obtuse". Of course I'm missing the point on a subject I initiated in this thread.... What a cop out.
Sure, let's blindly cling to the fantasy that a business model that was successful 50 years ago will be successful 50 years from now, completely ignoring all the variables. Change is death.
Umm I've never suggested otherwise re: the Red V. I love the Red V, own several of them and have always agreed that it should forever be our main jersey. Find a single post where I've said otherwise.
However I aknowledge that the alternative jersey is an NRL requirement and is an effective marketing and revenue raising tool. On top of all that I actually like many of our alternative designs (I know f*** me, right!?). The Blood and Bandages, a couple of Charity Shields, an Indigenous design and a couple of Illawarra alternatives all hold pride of place amongst my collection of Red V's.
As far as I'm concerned if it's Red and White then it's alright.
But if my loyalty to the Red V isn't as staunch as some, if I'm accepting of change then by some posters logic I mustn't be as invested in the club as they are. Ridiculous.
Take it easy brother no one is questioning anyone's loyalty.
Understand NRL requirement.
Doesn't mean I don't like to see alternative strips for specific games like Charity Shield or ANZAC day, just saying its not a business to me.
The loyalty comment was aimed at grouch who seems to claim without the Red V and Kogarah there's nothing left in the club to be invested in.
Since our own obtuse Nick fired the first shots in some kind of generational warfare... I might opine this. Nick et al are simply incapable of defining exactly WHY they are invested in this club. They are bereft. We can release local players, we can sign up convicted violent criminals, we can make a home at Allianz and ANZ and wherever else. Apparently, all that matters is that the shirts we wear at the time contain the colours red and white. Might I contend that this highlights the shallowness of his generation?
Since our own obtuse Nick fired the first shots in some kind of generational warfare... I might opine this. Nick et al are simply incapable of defining exactly WHY they are invested in this club. They are bereft. We can release local players, we can sign up convicted violent criminals, we can make a home at Allianz and ANZ and wherever else. Apparently, all that matters is that the shirts we wear at the time contain the colours red and white. Might I contend that this highlights the shallowness of his generation?
Most of these do not represent an "emotional investment". All you've listed are "catalysts". For example.. when Kriss Kross emerged in the early 90's they were the catalyst for people wearing their pants backwards. The fad quickly passed though. Because there was no depth.
The only one with any real emotional connection is Pop taking them to a game. But when Pop is considered an irrelevant or "dead" demographic, that one seems to be at risk.