Iamback
Referee
- Messages
- 20,283
Lovely language.
It is $640 odd million vs early $400 odd million. There are also reports that their cash element is near $4 billion. So unless the NRL is lying and have got a lot more than they actually did then what you want me to do? Give V’Landys a pat on the back?
Have a read of the article that Webster wrote and V’Landys ‘responses’ Have a read about how the codes both did their negotiations. Compare our ratings. How much data or evidence do you need to admit something is wrong. It’s not my problem you don’t want to question the ‘leader’ or other inconvenient truths
I don’t hate the NRL, I love the game of Rugby League. That’s why I am frustrated by the situation on the TV rights between our game and fumbleball and the way that the game is generally run. You know where that extra money and revenue is going to go to - attacking our game, building ovals and funding their grassroots against in league areas
Just because you’re happy for the game to kowtow to News Ltd and other interests and never realise it’s potential then that’s your problem
Again is the $400m including of the $20m for Dolphins?
The $640m includes Telstra money, some of which is updating to better wifi at Marvel. Nothing to do with TV.
So provide actual facts so can discuss UNTIL so you are just whinging for the sake of whinging
As for the grassroots funding AFL does 100% of that in NRL the clubs do most of it