The_Wookie
Bench
- Messages
- 3,412
When it comes to annual report data. It's not even close.
Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
When it comes to annual report data. It's not even close.
of course I do, I'm glad you're finally waking up to it.
why? we didn't go up from 16 to 17 clubs with the extra content.
At the end of the Story was a comment on cost control and in another paper it gave the name of the woman who is the Chief Financial officer CFO who also stated we must control costs- so I don't see Foxtel paying overs for the AFL.Foxtel chief executive Patrick Delany has indicated the pay TV provider will attempt to outmuscle rival media companies in the battle for sports rights, after parent company News Corp delivered a record full-year profit.
News Corp reported a $US760 million ($1.1 billion) profit in fiscal 2022, almost double the previous year, on the back of $US10.4 billion in revenue. Foxtel, which is 65 per cent owned by News, said nearly one quarter of its total revenue for the financial year was driven by its streaming services: Binge, Kayo Sports and Flash.
‘Plenty of capacity to pay’: Foxtel ready to outmuscle rivals for sports rights
Foxtel has signaled it will try to outmuscle rival media companies for sports rights, after parent company News Corp delivered a record profit.www.theage.com.au
12 games a year extra
$146mill avg, we've been through this! Discounts in 20-22, more in 23&24 (same for Fox)More AFL games expected behind paywall in next broadcast deal
More AFL games are likely to end up behind a paywall in the next broadcast deal, regardless of which party wins the bid for the AFL rights.
WOW The AFL does not have the gonads and are going down the Banker Smith road? In the press release written by Nial he says Foxtel wants to go to 3 games nationally including Super Saturday and Home state broadcasts talk to Seven. Whats to talk about , he seems to be saying ( Foxtel) pay Seven for the 'home market' and 3 games - So the AFL will miss out? What a dumb negotiating strategy . It's all to hard for the AFL to arrange the deal to suit the biggest payer. Looks like their will be a loss of income with Seven getting cut of the action.
Quote
In effect, this means Foxtel would have to strike a deal with Seven. There has been tension in the relationship between Foxtel and Seven over exclusivity in certain markets and other differences. End of Quote
Well Nial goes on about the $473m per year contract , which starts in about 6 mths form now. Only once did CEO Warrbutton say we signed a extended contract, on 'improved terms' The average was $146m over the five years of the contract. I find it hard to believe that Seven is paying extremely over the $146m, ( improved terms) which has been advanced by Mr Red only... So the figures HAVE NEVER ADDED UP- It's always short.
I said the negotiations are going to have a poison pill- who is going to swallow? The loser will pay less- Seven can'treally go up from the Average $146 and if they to lose home markets, Saturday broadcasting- Foxtel who said they paying little more than the old contract, ( roughly $230m) will only go up if they get these 'conditions which are Seven's according the AFL. Maybe the AFL should negotiate with Teltsta ( we have herd from them in the negotiations ) what with the contract running out in a few months.
Vkandys buying the gambaro hotel
Seven losing a lot of content there and afl losing a lot of fta accessMore AFL games expected behind paywall in next broadcast deal
More AFL games are likely to end up behind a paywall in the next broadcast deal, regardless of which party wins the bid for the AFL rights.
WOW The AFL does not have the gonads and are going down the Banker Smith road? In the press release for the AFL written by Nial he says Foxtel wants to go to 3 games nationally including Super Saturday and Home state broadcasts talk to Seven. Whats to talk about , he seems to be saying ( Foxtel) pay Seven for the 'home market' and 3 games - So the AFL will miss out? What a dumb negotiating strategy . It's all to hard for the AFL to arrange the deal to suit the biggest payer. Looks like their will be a loss of income with Seven getting a cut of the action.
Quote
In effect, this means Foxtel would have to strike a deal with Seven. There has been tension in the relationship between Foxtel and Seven over exclusivity in certain markets and other differences. End of Quote
Well Nial goes on about the $473m per year contract , which starts in about 6 mths form now. Only once did CEO Warrbutton say we signed a extended contract, on 'improved terms' The average was $146m over the five years of the contract. I find it hard to believe that Seven is paying extremely over the $146m, ( improved terms) which has been advanced by Mr Red only... So the figures HAVE NEVER ADDED UP- It's always short.
I said the negotiations are going to have a poison pill- who is going to swallow? The loser will pay less- Seven can't really go up from the Average $146 and if they to lose home markets, Saturday broadcasting why would they pay more in fact they will pay less- Foxtel who said they paying little more than the old contract, ( roughly $230m) will only go up if they get these 'conditions which are Seven's according the AFL. Maybe the AFL should negotiate with Teltsta ( we haven't herd from them in the negotiations ) what with their ( 50m) contract running out in a few months.
NRL buys a $25mill hotel, AFL buys a $1/2bill stadium. Probably sums up the two sports.
Its highly unlikely, unless the Paramount offer is so big they cant say no. It doesn't look like it will be (would need to be well over Fox/Ch7 probably $50-100 mill a year over) so its highly likely they'll stick with the tried and tested but the competition will keep the number up.
Fox and seven aren’t losing the afl
You know what the kicker is? Foxtel and Seven know what they are paying Now and most importantly what they are paying for 2023-2024. Since the AFL did not name the amount both these Organizations are paying in the extended contract, by deductive reasoning THEY KNOW THE AFL ARE LYING regarding the $473 per year. Wonder how that goes in negotiations. Usually negotiations rely on full faith and trust. Not much of those qualities around here. So the AFL lies have finally caught up with them. The $600m Paramount bullshit is the cherry on top. Notice how they say what the PAramount amount was, it never made sence, because a expert for Paramount would have noticed this bull/s number $946m for two years..... or $473 for one year.
| Bottom Line: Society doesn't like to be reminded of the world it lives in so it masks itself with false imagery of the finer things |
